Price (USD)
Sticky Brick Runt edgeLinx Apollo
$260
Sticky Brick Runt
$146
Sticky Brick Runt is typically around $114 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Linx Apollo vs Sticky Brick Runt
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
VS
Sticky Brick Runt
Sticky Brick Labs $146
Editorial Summary
Linx Apollo and Sticky Brick Runt solve similar use-cases with different tradeoffs. Sticky Brick Runt is usually the lower-cost pick at $146, around $114 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
20
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
5%
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$260
Sticky Brick Runt
$146
Temperature Range
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Sticky Brick Runt
N/A
Chamber Capacity
Linx Apollo
N/A
Sticky Brick Runt
0.1g - 0.25g
Battery Type
Linx Apollo
Internal
Sticky Brick Runt
None
Battery Capacity
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
Sticky Brick Runt
N/A
Battery Life
Linx Apollo
~10 sessions
Sticky Brick Runt
N/A
Charging
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Sticky Brick Runt
N/A
Charge Time
Linx Apollo
3-4 hours
Sticky Brick Runt
N/A
Power Adjustment
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
Sticky Brick Runt
Manual
Brand
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor
Sticky Brick Runt
Sticky Brick Labs
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward portable and concentrates sessions.
- You prefer Linx Apollo's overall feature mix and form factor.
Choose Sticky Brick Runt if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($146 vs $260).
- You prefer a convection heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward wood and analog sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
19 differ 1 shared
| Specification | Linx Apollo | Sticky Brick Runt |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $260 | $146 |
| Device Type | Portable | — |
| Heating Type | — | Convection |
| Temperature Range | 220°F - 428°F | N/A |
| Chamber Capacity | N/A | 0.1g - 0.25g |
| Battery Type | Internal | None |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | N/A |
| Battery Life | ~10 sessions | N/A |
| Charging | Micro USB | N/A |
| Charge Time | 3-4 hours | N/A |
| Dimensions | 60 x 40 x 40mm | — |
| Weight | 150 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | Manual |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | — |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | Sticky Brick Labs |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | Yes |
| Country of Manufacture | — | United States (USA) |
| Session Style | — | On-Demand |
| Warranty | 1 year | Lifetime |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the Linx Apollo and the Sticky Brick Runt?
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the Sticky Brick Runt sits at $146 while the Linx Apollo is $260, a gap of about $114 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Which is cheaper, the Linx Apollo or the Sticky Brick Runt?
Sticky Brick Runt is the cheaper option at $146 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $114 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Can I set custom temperatures on the Linx Apollo or the Sticky Brick Runt?
Linx Apollo controls heat with modular - 4 stages, while the Sticky Brick Runt uses manual. Both let you change temperature, just with different levels of precision.
How much flower do the Linx Apollo and Sticky Brick Runt hold?
Linx Apollo lists a chamber capacity of N/A; the Sticky Brick Runt lists 0.1g - 0.25g.
What battery life can I expect from the Linx Apollo and the Sticky Brick Runt?
Linx Apollo's spec sheet lists ~10 sessions; the Sticky Brick Runt lists N/A. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.