Price (USD)
Linx Apollo edgeLinx Apollo
$260
PAX FLOW
$350
Linx Apollo is typically around $90 lower.
VS
Linx Apollo vs PAX FLOW
Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
Editorial Summary
Linx Apollo and PAX FLOW are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Linx Apollo is usually the lower-cost pick at $260, around $90 below PAX FLOW. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
14
Different Specs
14
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
PortableElectronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
Close / ContextualLinx Apollo
—
PAX FLOW
30-45 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Weight
PAX FLOW edgeLinx Apollo
150 grams
PAX FLOW
135 grams
PAX FLOW is the lighter listed unit.
Heating Style
Close / ContextualLinx Apollo
—
PAX FLOW
Hybrid (conduction + convection)
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$260
PAX FLOW
$350
Device Type
Linx Apollo
—
PAX FLOW
Portable
Heating Type
Linx Apollo
—
PAX FLOW
Hybrid (conduction + convection)
Heat Up Time
Linx Apollo
—
PAX FLOW
30-45 seconds
Temperature Range
Linx Apollo
—
PAX FLOW
180°C - 225°C (356°F - 437°F)
Chamber Capacity
Linx Apollo
—
PAX FLOW
0.25g - 0.35g
Battery Capacity
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
PAX FLOW
2000mAh (internal)
Charge Time
Linx Apollo
—
PAX FLOW
~20 minutes to 50%, ~40 minutes to full (USB-C)
Dimensions
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
PAX FLOW
107mm x 34.5mm x 29mm
Weight
Linx Apollo
150 grams
PAX FLOW
135 grams
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($260 vs $350).
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward concentrates sessions.
Choose PAX FLOW if...
- You prefer a hybrid (conduction + convection) heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward hybrid and discrete sessions.
- You prefer PAX FLOW's overall feature mix and form factor.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (14 differences, 0 overlaps)
| Specification | Linx Apollo | PAX FLOW |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $260 | $350 |
| Device Type diff | — | Portable |
| Heating Type diff | — | Hybrid (conduction + convection) |
| Heat Up Time diff | — | 30-45 seconds |
| Temperature Range diff | — | 180°C - 225°C (356°F - 437°F) |
| Chamber Capacity diff | — | 0.25g - 0.35g |
| Battery Capacity diff | 2600mAh | 2000mAh (internal) |
| Charge Time diff | — | ~20 minutes to 50%, ~40 minutes to full (USB-C) |
| Dimensions diff | 60 x 40 x 40mm | 107mm x 34.5mm x 29mm |
| Weight diff | 150 grams | 135 grams |
| Power Adjustment diff | Modular - 4 Stages | Five petal modes + Bong Mode |
| Brand diff | Linx Vapor | PAX Labs |
| Run Time diff | — | About 5-7 sessions per charge |
| Session Length diff | — | 8-minute timer |
Comparison FAQs
Is Linx Apollo better than PAX FLOW?
Neither is universally better. Linx Apollo fits some priorities, while PAX FLOW fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
Which is cheaper: Linx Apollo or PAX FLOW?
Linx Apollo is listed lower ($260) compared with PAX FLOW ($350), but live retailer pricing can change.
Which heats up faster between Linx Apollo and PAX FLOW?
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Need a Different Matchup?
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.