Price (USD)
Close callIOLITE 2.0
$90
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
IOLITE 2.0
IOLITE $90
XMAX Starry V3
XMAX $100
IOLITE 2.0 and XMAX Starry V3 are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($90 vs $100). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
23
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
12%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
IOLITE 2.0
$90
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Pricing is very close between both devices.
IOLITE 2.0
81g
XMAX Starry V3
120g
IOLITE 2.0 is the lighter listed unit.
IOLITE 2.0
Conduction
XMAX Starry V3
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
IOLITE 2.0
$90
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Temperature Range
IOLITE 2.0
Fixed at 190°C (374°F)
XMAX Starry V3
212°F - 464°F
Chamber Capacity
IOLITE 2.0
~0.5g
XMAX Starry V3
0.3g
Battery Type
IOLITE 2.0
None
XMAX Starry V3
18650
Battery Capacity
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
XMAX Starry V3
2900mAh
Battery Life
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
XMAX Starry V3
60-80 minutes
Charging
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
XMAX Starry V3
Micro USB
Charge Time
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
XMAX Starry V3
90-120 minutes
Dimensions
IOLITE 2.0
102x25x64mm
XMAX Starry V3
11 x 3.5 x 2.4 cm
Weight
IOLITE 2.0
81g
XMAX Starry V3
120g
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | IOLITE 2.0 | XMAX Starry V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $90 | $100 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | Fixed at 190°C (374°F) | 212°F - 464°F |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.5g | 0.3g |
| Battery Type | None | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | N/A | 2900mAh |
| Battery Life | N/A | 60-80 minutes |
| Charging | N/A | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | N/A | 90-120 minutes |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | 102x25x64mm | 11 x 3.5 x 2.4 cm |
| Weight | 81g | 120g |
| Power Adjustment | Fixed | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Ceramic |
| Brand | IOLITE | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | No |
| Country of Manufacture | Ireland | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2019 |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | Session | Session |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 23 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
IOLITE 2.0 has the larger chamber at ~0.5g, versus 0.3g on the XMAX Starry V3. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
IOLITE 2.0 is the lighter unit at 81g, around 39g less than the XMAX Starry V3 at 120g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Listed prices are close: $90 for the IOLITE 2.0 versus $100 for the XMAX Starry V3. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
XMAX Starry V3 uses 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The IOLITE 2.0 has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
IOLITE 2.0 controls heat with fixed, while the XMAX Starry V3 uses digital (precise). XMAX Starry V3 gives you finer per-degree control.
XMAX Starry V3 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the IOLITE 2.0 is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.