Price (USD)
Close callIOLITE 2.0
$90
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
IOLITE 2.0
IOLITE $90
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
IOLITE 2.0 and XMAX QOMO are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($90 vs $89). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
9%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
IOLITE 2.0
$90
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
IOLITE 2.0
Conduction
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
IOLITE 2.0
$90
XMAX QOMO
$89
Temperature Range
IOLITE 2.0
Fixed at 190°C (374°F)
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
IOLITE 2.0
~0.5g
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Type
IOLITE 2.0
None
XMAX QOMO
Internal
Battery Capacity
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charging
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Charge Time
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
IOLITE 2.0
102x25x64mm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Power Adjustment
IOLITE 2.0
Fixed
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | IOLITE 2.0 | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $90 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | Fixed at 190°C (374°F) | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.5g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | None | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | N/A | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | N/A | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | N/A | USB-C |
| Charge Time | N/A | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 102x25x64mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | 81g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Fixed | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | IOLITE | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | Ireland | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2020 |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 20 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
IOLITE 2.0 has the larger chamber at ~0.5g, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $90 for the IOLITE 2.0 versus $89 for the XMAX QOMO. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
IOLITE 2.0's spec sheet lists N/A; the XMAX QOMO lists 10-20 Sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Across the 22 specs we line up, they share 2 and differ on 20, an overlap of about 9%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.