Price (USD)
IOLITE 2.0 edgeIOLITE 2.0
$90
PAX 3
$250
IOLITE 2.0 is typically around $160 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
IOLITE 2.0
IOLITE $90
PAX 3
PAX Labs $250
IOLITE 2.0 and PAX 3 are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. IOLITE 2.0 is usually the lower-cost pick at $90, around $160 below PAX 3. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
14%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
IOLITE 2.0
$90
PAX 3
$250
IOLITE 2.0 is typically around $160 lower.
IOLITE 2.0
81g
PAX 3
~93 grams
IOLITE 2.0 is the lighter listed unit.
IOLITE 2.0
Conduction
PAX 3
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
IOLITE 2.0
$90
PAX 3
$250
Temperature Range
IOLITE 2.0
Fixed at 190°C (374°F)
PAX 3
182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F)
Chamber Capacity
IOLITE 2.0
~0.5g
PAX 3
<0.35 grams
Battery Type
IOLITE 2.0
None
PAX 3
Internal 18650
Battery Capacity
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
PAX 3
3500mAh
Battery Life
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
PAX 3
~90 minutes
Charging
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
PAX 3
Proprietary Dock
Charge Time
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
PAX 3
~90 minutes
Dimensions
IOLITE 2.0
102x25x64mm
PAX 3
98mm x 31mm x 22mm
Weight
IOLITE 2.0
81g
PAX 3
~93 grams
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | IOLITE 2.0 | PAX 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $90 | $250 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | <30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | Fixed at 190°C (374°F) | 182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.5g | <0.35 grams |
| Battery Type | None | Internal 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | N/A | 3500mAh |
| Battery Life | N/A | ~90 minutes |
| Charging | N/A | Proprietary Dock |
| Charge Time | N/A | ~90 minutes |
| Bluetooth / App | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | 102x25x64mm | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm |
| Weight | 81g | ~93 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Fixed | Modular - 4 stages |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | IOLITE | PAX Labs |
| Country of Manufacture | Ireland | — |
| Release Date | — | 2016 |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | 2 years | 10 years |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the IOLITE 2.0 sits at $90 while the PAX 3 is $250, a gap of about $160 that puts them in different buying brackets.
IOLITE 2.0 is the cheaper option at $90 compared with $250 for the PAX 3, about $160 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
IOLITE 2.0 has the larger chamber at ~0.5g, versus <0.35 grams on the PAX 3. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
PAX 3 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the IOLITE 2.0 is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
IOLITE 2.0's spec sheet lists N/A; the PAX 3 lists ~90 minutes. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Across the 22 specs we line up, they share 3 and differ on 19, an overlap of about 14%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.