Price (USD)
Linx Apollo edgeFrolic Thermal Extractor
$399
Linx Apollo
$260
Linx Apollo is typically around $139 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Frolic Thermal Extractor
Limelight $399
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
Frolic Thermal Extractor and Linx Apollo are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Linx Apollo is usually the lower-cost pick at $260, around $139 below Frolic Thermal Extractor. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
21
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
10%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Frolic Thermal Extractor
$399
Linx Apollo
$260
Linx Apollo is typically around $139 lower.
Frolic Thermal Extractor
245g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Linx Apollo is the lighter listed unit.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Frolic Thermal Extractor
$399
Linx Apollo
$260
Temperature Range
Frolic Thermal Extractor
40°C - 240°C
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Chamber Capacity
Frolic Thermal Extractor
~0.25g
Linx Apollo
N/A
Battery Type
Frolic Thermal Extractor
Removable 21700
Linx Apollo
Internal
Battery Capacity
Frolic Thermal Extractor
5000mAh
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
Battery Life
Frolic Thermal Extractor
~13 sessions
Linx Apollo
~10 sessions
Charging
Frolic Thermal Extractor
USB-C
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Charge Time
Frolic Thermal Extractor
~1 hour 40 minutes
Linx Apollo
3-4 hours
Dimensions
Frolic Thermal Extractor
105x63x24mm
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Weight
Frolic Thermal Extractor
245g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Frolic Thermal Extractor | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $399 | $260 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | — |
| Heat Up Time | Variable | — |
| Temperature Range | 40°C - 240°C | 220°F - 428°F |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.25g | N/A |
| Battery Type | Removable 21700 | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 5000mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | ~13 sessions | ~10 sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~1 hour 40 minutes | 3-4 hours |
| Dimensions | 105x63x24mm | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | 245g | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Anodized Aluminum | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Limelight | Linx Vapor |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | Yes |
| Release Date | 2025 | — |
| Session Style | Both | — |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the Linx Apollo sits at $260 while the Frolic Thermal Extractor is $399, a gap of about $139 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Linx Apollo is the cheaper option at $260 compared with $399 for the Frolic Thermal Extractor, about $139 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Linx Apollo is the lighter unit at 150 grams, around 95g less than the Frolic Thermal Extractor at 245g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Frolic Thermal Extractor uses removable 21700, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The Linx Apollo has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Frolic Thermal Extractor controls heat with digital, while the Linx Apollo uses modular - 4 stages. Frolic Thermal Extractor gives you finer per-degree control.
Frolic Thermal Extractor lists a chamber capacity of ~0.25g; the Linx Apollo lists N/A.
Frolic Thermal Extractor fully charges in ~1 hour 40 minutes, ahead of 3-4 hours on the Linx Apollo.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.