Price (USD)
XMAX Starry 4 edgeFocus V Carta Classic
$200
XMAX Starry 4
$99
XMAX Starry 4 is typically around $101 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Focus V Carta Classic
Focus V $200
XMAX Starry 4
XMAX $99
Focus V Carta Classic and XMAX Starry 4 are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Starry 4 is usually the lower-cost pick at $99, around $101 below Focus V Carta Classic. Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
28
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
7
Overall Overlap
25%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Focus V Carta Classic
$200
XMAX Starry 4
$99
XMAX Starry 4 is typically around $101 lower.
Focus V Carta Classic
~10 Seconds
XMAX Starry 4
~15 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Focus V Carta Classic
Conduction
XMAX Starry 4
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Focus V Carta Classic
$200
XMAX Starry 4
$99
Heat Up Time
Focus V Carta Classic
~10 Seconds
XMAX Starry 4
~15 seconds
Temperature Range
Focus V Carta Classic
600°F - 940°F
XMAX Starry 4
100℃-240℃ (212℉-464℉)
Battery Type
Focus V Carta Classic
2x 18350 Batteries
XMAX Starry 4
18650
Battery Capacity
Focus V Carta Classic
2400mAh (1200mAh x 2)
XMAX Starry 4
2550mAh
Battery Life
Focus V Carta Classic
~40-50 sessions
XMAX Starry 4
~60 minutes
Charge Time
Focus V Carta Classic
~2 Hours
XMAX Starry 4
~90 minutes
Power Adjustment
Focus V Carta Classic
Modular - 4 Stages or Precision Control via App
XMAX Starry 4
Digital (precise)
Brand
Focus V Carta Classic
Focus V
XMAX Starry 4
XMAX
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Focus V Carta Classic | XMAX Starry 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $200 | $99 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~10 Seconds | ~15 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 600°F - 940°F | 100℃-240℃ (212℉-464℉) |
| Chamber Capacity | — | 0.4g |
| Battery Type | 2x 18350 Batteries | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 2400mAh (1200mAh x 2) | 2550mAh |
| Battery Life | ~40-50 sessions | ~60 minutes |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~2 Hours | ~90 minutes |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth / App | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | — | 115.9 x 37.5 x 24mm |
| Weight | — | ~137g |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages or Precision Control via App | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | Focus V | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | Yes |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | Session | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX Starry 4 sits at $99 while the Focus V Carta Classic is $200, a gap of about $101 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX Starry 4 is the cheaper option at $99 compared with $200 for the Focus V Carta Classic, about $101 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Focus V Carta Classic reaches session-ready temperature in ~10 Seconds, while the XMAX Starry 4 takes ~15 seconds. That's roughly 5 seconds quicker on the Focus V Carta Classic, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
XMAX Starry 4 fully charges in ~90 minutes, ahead of ~2 Hours on the Focus V Carta Classic.
XMAX Starry 4 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the Focus V Carta Classic is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Focus V Carta Classic's spec sheet lists ~40-50 sessions; the XMAX Starry 4 lists ~60 minutes. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Across the 28 specs we line up, they share 7 and differ on 21, an overlap of about 25%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.