Price (USD)
Flowermate Aura edgeFlowermate Aura
$65
VapeXhale Cloud EVO
$400
Flowermate Aura is typically around $335 lower.
VS
Flowermate Aura vs VapeXhale Cloud EVO
Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
Editorial Summary
Flowermate Aura and VapeXhale Cloud EVO are both electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Flowermate Aura is usually the lower-cost pick at $65, around $335 below VapeXhale Cloud EVO. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
10
Different Specs
10
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
Close / ContextualFlowermate Aura
~60 seconds
VapeXhale Cloud EVO
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Heating Style
Close / ContextualFlowermate Aura
Conduction
VapeXhale Cloud EVO
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Flowermate Aura
$65
VapeXhale Cloud EVO
$400
Heating Type
Flowermate Aura
Conduction
VapeXhale Cloud EVO
—
Heat Up Time
Flowermate Aura
~60 seconds
VapeXhale Cloud EVO
—
Temperature Range
Flowermate Aura
40 - 230°C
VapeXhale Cloud EVO
—
Battery Capacity
Flowermate Aura
2600mAh
VapeXhale Cloud EVO
—
Pass-Through Charging
Flowermate Aura
Yes
VapeXhale Cloud EVO
—
Dimensions
Flowermate Aura
14.7 x 2.8 cm
VapeXhale Cloud EVO
—
Brand
Flowermate Aura
Flowermate
VapeXhale Cloud EVO
—
Chamber Material
Flowermate Aura
Ceramic
VapeXhale Cloud EVO
—
Display Type
Flowermate Aura
OLED
VapeXhale Cloud EVO
—
Choose Flowermate Aura if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($65 vs $400).
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward portable and pen sessions.
Choose VapeXhale Cloud EVO if...
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward desktop and concentrates sessions.
- You prefer VapeXhale Cloud EVO's overall feature mix and form factor.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (10 differences, 0 overlaps)
| Specification | Flowermate Aura | VapeXhale Cloud EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $65 | $400 |
| Heating Type diff | Conduction | — |
| Heat Up Time diff | ~60 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range diff | 40 - 230°C | — |
| Battery Capacity diff | 2600mAh | — |
| Pass-Through Charging diff | Yes | — |
| Dimensions diff | 14.7 x 2.8 cm | — |
| Brand diff | Flowermate | — |
| Chamber Material diff | Ceramic | — |
| Display Type diff | OLED | — |
Comparison FAQs
Is Flowermate Aura better than VapeXhale Cloud EVO?
Neither is universally better. Flowermate Aura fits some priorities, while VapeXhale Cloud EVO fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
Which is cheaper: Flowermate Aura or VapeXhale Cloud EVO?
Flowermate Aura is listed lower ($65) compared with VapeXhale Cloud EVO ($400), but live retailer pricing can change.
Which heats up faster between Flowermate Aura and VapeXhale Cloud EVO?
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Need a Different Matchup?
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.