Price (USD)
Close callFirefly 2+
$250
Linx Apollo
$260
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Firefly 2+
Firefly Vapor $250
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
Firefly 2+ and Linx Apollo are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($250 vs $260). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Firefly 2+
$250
Linx Apollo
$260
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Firefly 2+
~140g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Firefly 2+ is the lighter listed unit.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Firefly 2+
$250
Linx Apollo
$260
Temperature Range
Firefly 2+
93°C - 260°C
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Chamber Capacity
Firefly 2+
~0.15g
Linx Apollo
N/A
Battery Type
Firefly 2+
Removable (proprietary)
Linx Apollo
Internal
Battery Capacity
Firefly 2+
770mAh
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
Battery Life
Firefly 2+
<90 minutes
Linx Apollo
~10 sessions
Charging
Firefly 2+
Proprietary Dock
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Charge Time
Firefly 2+
~45 minutes
Linx Apollo
3-4 hours
Dimensions
Firefly 2+
129x36x24mm
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Weight
Firefly 2+
~140g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Firefly 2+ | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $260 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | — |
| Heat Up Time | ~3 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 93°C - 260°C | 220°F - 428°F |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.15g | N/A |
| Battery Type | Removable (proprietary) | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 770mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | <90 minutes | ~10 sessions |
| Charging | Proprietary Dock | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~45 minutes | 3-4 hours |
| Pass-Through Charging | No | — |
| Dimensions | 129x36x24mm | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | ~140g | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Digital (precise) | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Firefly Vapor | Linx Vapor |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | Yes |
| Chamber Type | Ceramic | — |
| Release Date | 2019 | — |
| Session Style | On-Demand | — |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 22 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
Listed prices are close: $250 for the Firefly 2+ versus $260 for the Linx Apollo. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Firefly 2+ uses removable (proprietary), so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The Linx Apollo has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Firefly 2+ controls heat with digital (precise), while the Linx Apollo uses modular - 4 stages. Firefly 2+ gives you finer per-degree control.
Firefly 2+ lists a chamber capacity of ~0.15g; the Linx Apollo lists N/A.
Firefly 2+ fully charges in ~45 minutes, ahead of 3-4 hours on the Linx Apollo.
Firefly 2+'s spec sheet lists <90 minutes; the Linx Apollo lists ~10 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.