Price (USD)
FENiX 2.0 edgeFENiX 2.0
$129
Linx Apollo
$260
FENiX 2.0 is typically around $131 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
FENiX 2.0 vs Linx Apollo
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
FENiX 2.0
FENiX $129
VS
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
Editorial Summary
FENiX 2.0 and Linx Apollo are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. FENiX 2.0 is usually the lower-cost pick at $129, around $131 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
13%
Shared Traits
Portable Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Weight
Linx Apollo edgeFENiX 2.0
~232 grams
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Linx Apollo is the lighter listed unit.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
FENiX 2.0
$129
Linx Apollo
$260
Temperature Range
FENiX 2.0
160°C - 221°C (320°F - 430°F)
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Battery Capacity
FENiX 2.0
4400 mAh
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
Battery Life
FENiX 2.0
~75 minutes
Linx Apollo
~10 sessions
Charge Time
FENiX 2.0
2.5 hours
Linx Apollo
3-4 hours
Dimensions
FENiX 2.0
110x60x30mm
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Weight
FENiX 2.0
~232 grams
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Power Adjustment
FENiX 2.0
Digital (precise)
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
Chamber Material
FENiX 2.0
Removable titanium
Linx Apollo
Quartz
Brand
FENiX 2.0
FENiX
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor
Choose FENiX 2.0 if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($129 vs $260).
- You prefer a convection heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward convection sessions.
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You want the lighter unit for carrying and travel.
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward concentrates sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
21 differ 3 shared
| Specification | FENiX 2.0 | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $129 | $260 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | — |
| Heat Up Time | <30 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 160°C - 221°C (320°F - 430°F) | 220°F - 428°F |
| Chamber Capacity | — | N/A |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 4400 mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | ~75 minutes | ~10 sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hours | 3-4 hours |
| Dimensions | 110x60x30mm | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | ~232 grams | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Digital (precise) | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Removable titanium | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | FENiX | Linx Vapor |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | Yes |
| Country of Manufacture | China | — |
| Display Type | 0.95 inch OLED | — |
| Manufacturer | South Reed Technology Co | — |
| Release Date | 2016 | — |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the FENiX 2.0 and the Linx Apollo?
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the FENiX 2.0 sits at $129 while the Linx Apollo is $260, a gap of about $131 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Which is cheaper, the FENiX 2.0 or the Linx Apollo?
FENiX 2.0 is the cheaper option at $129 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $131 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Which is lighter, the FENiX 2.0 or the Linx Apollo?
Linx Apollo is the lighter unit at 150 grams, around 82g less than the FENiX 2.0 at ~232 grams. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Can I set custom temperatures on the FENiX 2.0 or the Linx Apollo?
FENiX 2.0 controls heat with digital (precise), while the Linx Apollo uses modular - 4 stages. FENiX 2.0 gives you finer per-degree control.
Which charges faster, the FENiX 2.0 or the Linx Apollo?
FENiX 2.0 fully charges in 2.5 hours, ahead of 3-4 hours on the Linx Apollo.
What battery life can I expect from the FENiX 2.0 and the Linx Apollo?
FENiX 2.0's spec sheet lists ~75 minutes; the Linx Apollo lists ~10 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
How similar are the FENiX 2.0 and the Linx Apollo?
Across the 24 specs we line up, they share 3 and differ on 21, an overlap of about 13%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.