Price (USD)
OG E-Nano edgeOG E-Nano
$200
Linx Apollo
$260
OG E-Nano is typically around $60 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
OG E-Nano vs Linx Apollo
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
OG E-Nano
Epickai $200
VS
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
Editorial Summary
OG E-Nano and Linx Apollo solve similar use-cases with different tradeoffs. OG E-Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $200, around $60 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Weight
OG E-Nano edgeOG E-Nano
~113g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
OG E-Nano is the lighter listed unit.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
OG E-Nano
$200
Linx Apollo
$260
Device Type
OG E-Nano
Desktop
Linx Apollo
Portable
Temperature Range
OG E-Nano
0-560°F
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Chamber Capacity
OG E-Nano
~0.25g
Linx Apollo
N/A
Battery Type
OG E-Nano
N/A
Linx Apollo
Internal
Charging
OG E-Nano
N/A
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Dimensions
OG E-Nano
95x51x51mm
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Weight
OG E-Nano
~113g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Power Adjustment
OG E-Nano
Rotary Knob
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
Chamber Material
OG E-Nano
Glass
Linx Apollo
Quartz
Choose OG E-Nano if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($200 vs $260).
- You want the lighter unit for carrying and travel.
- You prefer a convection heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward desktop and convection sessions.
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward portable and concentrates sessions.
- You prefer Linx Apollo's overall feature mix and form factor.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
22 differ 0 shared
| Specification | OG E-Nano | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $200 | $260 |
| Device Type | Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | — |
| Heat Up Time | 2 Minutes | — |
| Temperature Range | 0-560°F | 220°F - 428°F |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.25g | N/A |
| Battery Type | N/A | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | — | ~10 sessions |
| Charging | N/A | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | — | 3-4 hours |
| Dimensions | 95x51x51mm | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | ~113g | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Rotary Knob | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Epickai | Linx Vapor |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | Yes |
| Country of Manufacture | United States (USA) | — |
| Power Cable Length | 2.5 Metres | — |
| Power Source | AC Power (110v) | — |
| Warranty | 3 years | 1 year |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the OG E-Nano and the Linx Apollo?
The biggest practical difference is form factor: these aren't the same kind of device. OG E-Nano is a desktop, Linx Apollo is a portable. Pick based on whether you want something portable or something stationary.
Which is cheaper, the OG E-Nano or the Linx Apollo?
OG E-Nano is the cheaper option at $200 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $60 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Which is lighter, the OG E-Nano or the Linx Apollo?
OG E-Nano is the lighter unit at ~113g, around 37g less than the Linx Apollo at 150 grams. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Is the OG E-Nano or the Linx Apollo better for home versus on-the-go use?
Linx Apollo is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the OG E-Nano is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
How much flower do the OG E-Nano and Linx Apollo hold?
OG E-Nano lists a chamber capacity of ~0.25g; the Linx Apollo lists N/A.
Which has a wider temperature range, the OG E-Nano or the Linx Apollo?
OG E-Nano covers 0-560°F, a wider band than the Linx Apollo at 220°F - 428°F. A wider range gives you more room to dial in flavor at the low end and big clouds at the top.
Is the OG E-Nano or the Linx Apollo better for microdosing?
OG E-Nano is the better fit for microdosing in our database, typically thanks to a smaller chamber, finer temperature control, or both.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.