Price (USD)
DynaVap The G3 edgeDynaVap The G3
$35
Modul
$350
DynaVap The G3 is typically around $315 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
DynaVap The G3
DynaVap $35
Modul
Stündenglass $350
DynaVap The G3 and Modul are both portable vaporizers, but they target different priorities. DynaVap The G3 is usually the lower-cost pick at $35, around $315 below Modul. DynaVap The G3 has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
25
Different Specs
24
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
DynaVap The G3
$35
Modul
$350
DynaVap The G3 is typically around $315 lower.
DynaVap The G3
~5-7 seconds with a torch
Modul
~15 Seconds
DynaVap The G3 has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
DynaVap The G3
Hybrid
Modul
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
DynaVap The G3
$35
Modul
$350
Heating Type
DynaVap The G3
Hybrid
Modul
Conduction
Heat Up Time
DynaVap The G3
~5-7 seconds with a torch
Modul
~15 Seconds
Temperature Range
DynaVap The G3
N/A
Modul
850°F-900°F (Dry Herb Tank)
Battery Type
DynaVap The G3
None
Modul
Internal
Battery Capacity
DynaVap The G3
N/A
Modul
6000mAh
Battery Life
DynaVap The G3
N/A
Modul
<50 Sessions Depending on Usage Style
Charging
DynaVap The G3
N/A
Modul
USB-C
Charge Time
DynaVap The G3
N/A
Modul
~2 Hours
Dimensions
DynaVap The G3
~75x10mm
Modul
154x68x50mm
Typical price
$35
Sold by Headshop.com
Prices are read automatically from retailer pages; confirm the price at checkout. Some links are affiliate links, which support Thermal Extractions at no extra cost to you.
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | DynaVap The G3 | Modul |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $35 | $350 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~5-7 seconds with a torch | ~15 Seconds |
| Temperature Range | N/A | 850°F-900°F (Dry Herb Tank) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.05g (fixed) | — |
| Battery Type | None | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | N/A | 6000mAh |
| Battery Life | N/A | <50 Sessions Depending on Usage Style |
| Charging | N/A | USB-C |
| Charge Time | N/A | ~2 Hours |
| Dimensions | ~75x10mm | 154x68x50mm |
| Weight | — | 387.5g |
| Power Adjustment | Manual | Digital |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Quartz |
| Brand | DynaVap | Stündenglass |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes, via the airport (no condenser) | — |
| Body Material | Glass unibody with a stainless steel Captive Cap | Anodized Aluminum |
| Country of Manufacture | United States (USA) | China |
| Display Type | — | 2.4” Color Display |
| Manufacturer | DynaVap LLC | — |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
| Session Style | On-Demand | Session |
| Warranty | 90 day satisfaction guarantee, glass is not covered for life | 2 years |
| Water Pipe Adapter | None, the unibody is not tapered | — |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the DynaVap The G3 sits at $35 while the Modul is $350, a gap of about $315 that puts them in different buying brackets.
DynaVap The G3 is the cheaper option at $35 compared with $350 for the Modul, about $315 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
DynaVap The G3 reaches session-ready temperature in ~5-7 seconds with a torch, while the Modul takes ~15 Seconds. That's roughly 9 seconds quicker on the DynaVap The G3, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
DynaVap The G3 uses hybrid heating, while the Modul uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
DynaVap The G3 controls heat with manual, while the Modul uses digital. Modul gives you finer per-degree control.
DynaVap The G3's spec sheet lists N/A; the Modul lists <50 Sessions Depending on Usage Style. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
DynaVap The G3 is the better fit for microdosing in our database, typically thanks to a smaller chamber, finer temperature control, or both.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.