Price (USD)
Dr. Dabber XS edgeDr. Dabber XS
$160
Linx Apollo
$190
Dr. Dabber XS is typically around $30 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Dr. Dabber XS
Dr. Dabber $160
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $190
Dr. Dabber XS and Linx Apollo are both concentrates / portable vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Dr. Dabber XS is usually the lower-cost pick at $160, around $30 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
25
Different Specs
23
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
8%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Dr. Dabber XS
$160
Linx Apollo
$190
Dr. Dabber XS is typically around $30 lower.
Dr. Dabber XS
266g (9.4 oz)
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Linx Apollo is the lighter listed unit.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Dr. Dabber XS
$160
Linx Apollo
$190
Temperature Range
Dr. Dabber XS
246-329°C (475-625°F)
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Battery Capacity
Dr. Dabber XS
900mAh
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
Battery Life
Dr. Dabber XS
20-35 heating cycles
Linx Apollo
~10 sessions
Charging
Dr. Dabber XS
USB-C
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Charge Time
Dr. Dabber XS
30-60 minutes depending on adapter
Linx Apollo
3-4 hours
Dimensions
Dr. Dabber XS
164 x 46mm (6.47 x 1.82 inches)
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Weight
Dr. Dabber XS
266g (9.4 oz)
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Power Adjustment
Dr. Dabber XS
4 preset settings
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
Chamber Material
Dr. Dabber XS
Quartz eChamber with built in temperature sensor
Linx Apollo
Quartz
Typical price
$160
Sold by The Stash Shack
Prices are read automatically from retailer pages; confirm the price at checkout. Some links are affiliate links, which support Thermal Extractions at no extra cost to you.
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Dr. Dabber XS | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $160 | $190 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction (Dr. Dabber TCH) | — |
| Heat Up Time | 9-12 seconds depending on setting | — |
| Temperature Range | 246-329°C (475-625°F) | 220°F - 428°F |
| Chamber Capacity | — | N/A |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 900mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | 20-35 heating cycles | ~10 sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | 30-60 minutes depending on adapter | 3-4 hours |
| Pass-Through Charging | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | 164 x 46mm (6.47 x 1.82 inches) | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | 266g (9.4 oz) | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | 4 preset settings | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Quartz eChamber with built in temperature sensor | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | Concentrates only | Yes |
| Brand | Dr. Dabber | Linx Vapor |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | Yes |
| Display Type | Colour coded LED button | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Manufacturer | DRD LLC | — |
| Release Date | 2023 | — |
| Session Style | Session (20 second hold) | — |
| Warranty | 1 year on the battery, charger and electrical components | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is portability: the Linx Apollo is roughly 116g lighter than the Dr. Dabber XS, which adds up over a day of pocket carry.
Dr. Dabber XS is the cheaper option at $160 compared with $190 for the Linx Apollo, about $30 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Linx Apollo is the lighter unit at 150 grams, around 116g less than the Dr. Dabber XS at 266g (9.4 oz). The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Dr. Dabber XS fully charges in 30-60 minutes depending on adapter, ahead of 3-4 hours on the Linx Apollo.
Dr. Dabber XS's spec sheet lists 20-35 heating cycles; the Linx Apollo lists ~10 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Dr. Dabber XS charges over USB-C; the Linx Apollo uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Across the 25 specs we line up, they share 2 and differ on 23, an overlap of about 8%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.