Price (USD)
DaVinci IQC edgeDaVinci IQC
$199
Linx Apollo
$260
DaVinci IQC is typically around $61 lower.
VS
DaVinci IQC vs Linx Apollo
Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
Editorial Summary
DaVinci IQC and Linx Apollo are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. DaVinci IQC is usually the lower-cost pick at $199, around $61 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
17
Different Specs
17
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
PortableElectronicConcentrates
Head-to-Head Highlights
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
Close / ContextualDaVinci IQC
~30 seconds
Linx Apollo
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Weight
Linx Apollo edgeDaVinci IQC
~160g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Linx Apollo is the lighter listed unit.
Heating Style
Close / ContextualDaVinci IQC
Conduction
Linx Apollo
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
DaVinci IQC
$199
Linx Apollo
$260
Heating Type
DaVinci IQC
Conduction
Linx Apollo
—
Heat Up Time
DaVinci IQC
~30 seconds
Linx Apollo
—
Temperature Range
DaVinci IQC
Up to 221°C
Linx Apollo
—
Chamber Capacity
DaVinci IQC
~0.5g
Linx Apollo
—
Battery Type
DaVinci IQC
Removable 18650 battery
Linx Apollo
—
Battery Capacity
DaVinci IQC
—
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
Battery Life
DaVinci IQC
~1 hour
Linx Apollo
—
Charging
DaVinci IQC
USB-C
Linx Apollo
—
Charge Time
DaVinci IQC
~2 hours
Linx Apollo
—
Choose DaVinci IQC if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($199 vs $260).
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward conduction and battery swap sessions.
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- You prefer Linx Apollo's overall feature mix and form factor.
- You prefer Linx Apollo's overall feature mix and form factor.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (17 differences, 0 overlaps)
| Specification | DaVinci IQC | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $199 | $260 |
| Heating Type diff | Conduction | — |
| Heat Up Time diff | ~30 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range diff | Up to 221°C | — |
| Chamber Capacity diff | ~0.5g | — |
| Battery Type diff | Removable 18650 battery | — |
| Battery Capacity diff | — | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life diff | ~1 hour | — |
| Charging diff | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time diff | ~2 hours | — |
| Pass-Through Charging diff | No | — |
| Dimensions diff | 92x45x25mm | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight diff | ~160g | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment diff | Digital Control | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Oven Type diff | Ceramic | — |
| Brand diff | DaVinci Tech | Linx Vapor |
| Heating Time diff | ~60 seconds | — |
Comparison FAQs
Is DaVinci IQC better than Linx Apollo?
Neither is universally better. DaVinci IQC fits some priorities, while Linx Apollo fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
Which is cheaper: DaVinci IQC or Linx Apollo?
DaVinci IQC is listed lower ($199) compared with Linx Apollo ($260), but live retailer pricing can change.
Which heats up faster between DaVinci IQC and Linx Apollo?
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Need a Different Matchup?
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.