Price (USD)
DaVinci IQC edgeDaVinci IQC
$199
Linx Apollo
$260
DaVinci IQC is typically around $61 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
DaVinci IQC vs Linx Apollo
DaVinci IQC
VS
Linx Apollo
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Editorial Summary
DaVinci IQC and Linx Apollo are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. DaVinci IQC is usually the lower-cost pick at $199, around $61 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
17
Different Specs
17
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Portable Electronic Concentrates
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
Close callDaVinci IQC
~30 seconds
Linx Apollo
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Weight
Linx Apollo edgeDaVinci IQC
~160g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Linx Apollo is the lighter listed unit.
Heating Style
Close callDaVinci IQC
Conduction
Linx Apollo
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
DaVinci IQC
$199
vs
Linx Apollo
$260
Heating Type
DaVinci IQC
Conduction
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Heat Up Time
DaVinci IQC
~30 seconds
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Temperature Range
DaVinci IQC
Up to 221°C
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Chamber Capacity
DaVinci IQC
~0.5g
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Battery Type
DaVinci IQC
Removable 18650 battery
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Battery Capacity
DaVinci IQC
—
vs
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
Battery Life
DaVinci IQC
~1 hour
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Charging
DaVinci IQC
USB-C
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Charge Time
DaVinci IQC
~2 hours
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Choose DaVinci IQC if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($199 vs $260).
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward conduction and battery swap sessions.
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- You prefer Linx Apollo's overall feature mix and form factor.
- You prefer Linx Apollo's overall feature mix and form factor.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
17 differ 0 shared
| Specification | DaVinci IQC | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $199 | $260 |
| Heating Type | Conduction | — |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | Up to 221°C | — |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.5g | — |
| Battery Type | Removable 18650 battery | — |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | ~1 hour | — |
| Charging | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time | ~2 hours | — |
| Pass-Through Charging | No | — |
| Dimensions | 92x45x25mm | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | ~160g | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Oven Type | Ceramic | — |
| Brand | DaVinci Tech | Linx Vapor |
| Heating Time | ~60 seconds | — |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the DaVinci IQC and the Linx Apollo?
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 17 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
Which is cheaper, the DaVinci IQC or the Linx Apollo?
DaVinci IQC is the cheaper option at $199 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $61 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Can I set custom temperatures on the DaVinci IQC or the Linx Apollo?
DaVinci IQC controls heat with digital control, while the Linx Apollo uses modular - 4 stages. DaVinci IQC gives you finer per-degree control.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.