Price (USD)
CAT edgeCAT
$199
PAX FLOW
$350
CAT is typically around $151 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
CAT
PAX FLOW
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
CAT and PAX FLOW are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. CAT is usually the lower-cost pick at $199, around $151 below PAX FLOW. Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
19
Different Specs
18
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
5%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
CAT
$199
PAX FLOW
$350
CAT is typically around $151 lower.
CAT
~30 seconds
PAX FLOW
30-45 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
CAT
—
PAX FLOW
135 grams
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
CAT
Convection
PAX FLOW
Hybrid (conduction + convection)
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
CAT
$199
PAX FLOW
$350
Heating Type
CAT
Convection
PAX FLOW
Hybrid (conduction + convection)
Heat Up Time
CAT
~30 seconds
PAX FLOW
30-45 seconds
Temperature Range
CAT
—
PAX FLOW
180°C - 225°C (356°F - 437°F)
Chamber Capacity
CAT
—
PAX FLOW
0.25g - 0.35g
Battery Type
CAT
Swappable 21700
PAX FLOW
—
Battery Capacity
CAT
4000mAh
PAX FLOW
2000mAh (internal)
Charging
CAT
USB-C
PAX FLOW
—
Charge Time
CAT
—
PAX FLOW
~20 minutes to 50%, ~40 minutes to full (USB-C)
Dimensions
CAT
—
PAX FLOW
107mm x 34.5mm x 29mm
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | CAT | PAX FLOW |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $199 | $350 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Hybrid (conduction + convection) |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | 30-45 seconds |
| Temperature Range | — | 180°C - 225°C (356°F - 437°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | — | 0.25g - 0.35g |
| Battery Type | Swappable 21700 | — |
| Battery Capacity | 4000mAh | 2000mAh (internal) |
| Charging | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time | — | ~20 minutes to 50%, ~40 minutes to full (USB-C) |
| Dimensions | — | 107mm x 34.5mm x 29mm |
| Weight | — | 135 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control | Five petal modes + Bong Mode |
| Brand | End Game Labs | PAX Labs |
| 14mm Water Pipe Adapter | Yes | — |
| 18mm Water Pipe Adapter | Yes | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Run Time | — | About 5-7 sessions per charge |
| Session Length | — | 8-minute timer |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the CAT sits at $199 while the PAX FLOW is $350, a gap of about $151 that puts them in different buying brackets.
CAT is the cheaper option at $199 compared with $350 for the PAX FLOW, about $151 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
CAT reaches session-ready temperature in ~30 seconds, while the PAX FLOW takes 30-45 seconds. That's roughly 8 seconds quicker on the CAT, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
CAT uses convection heating, while the PAX FLOW uses hybrid (conduction + convection). Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
CAT controls heat with digital control, while the PAX FLOW uses five petal modes + bong mode. CAT gives you finer per-degree control.
Only the CAT has a documented water-pipe adapter option. The PAX FLOW doesn't list one, though aftermarket adapters sometimes exist for popular models.
PAX FLOW is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the CAT is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.