Price (USD)
Camouflet Convector XL edgeCamouflet Convector XL
$139
Linx Apollo
$190
Camouflet Convector XL is typically around $51 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Camouflet Convector XL
Camouflet $139
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $190
Camouflet Convector XL and Linx Apollo are both portable vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Camouflet Convector XL is usually the lower-cost pick at $139, around $51 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
25
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Camouflet Convector XL
$139
Linx Apollo
$190
Camouflet Convector XL is typically around $51 lower.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Camouflet Convector XL
$139
Linx Apollo
$190
Temperature Range
Camouflet Convector XL
N/A (set by heat source and heating time)
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Chamber Capacity
Camouflet Convector XL
0.2g
Linx Apollo
N/A
Battery Type
Camouflet Convector XL
None
Linx Apollo
Internal
Battery Capacity
Camouflet Convector XL
N/A
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
Battery Life
Camouflet Convector XL
N/A
Linx Apollo
~10 sessions
Charging
Camouflet Convector XL
N/A
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Power Adjustment
Camouflet Convector XL
Manual
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
Chamber Material
Camouflet Convector XL
Titanium with cooling fins
Linx Apollo
Quartz
Brand
Camouflet Convector XL
Camouflet
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Camouflet Convector XL | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $139 | $190 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection (torch or induction heated heater plate matrix) | — |
| Heat Up Time | 7-15 seconds with a small torch, 4-7 seconds with the Camouflet Inductor | — |
| Temperature Range | N/A (set by heat source and heating time) | 220°F - 428°F |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.2g | N/A |
| Battery Type | None | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | N/A | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | N/A | ~10 sessions |
| Charging | N/A | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | — | 3-4 hours |
| Dimensions | — | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | — | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Manual | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Titanium with cooling fins | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Camouflet | Linx Vapor |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | Yes |
| Cap Material | Stainless steel with a laser welded heater plate matrix | — |
| Cooling | Quad bore ceramic tube inside the stem | — |
| Release Date | 2023 | — |
| Session Style | On-Demand | — |
| Stem Connection | 8mm, cross compatible with DynaVap tips and stems | — |
| Stem Material | Titanium | — |
| Warranty | 30 days on manufacturing defects, case by case afterwards | 1 year |
| Water Pipe Adapter | 14mm male tapered stem, no adapter needed | — |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 25 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
Camouflet Convector XL is the cheaper option at $139 compared with $190 for the Linx Apollo, about $51 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Camouflet Convector XL controls heat with manual, while the Linx Apollo uses modular - 4 stages. Both let you change temperature, just with different levels of precision.
Camouflet Convector XL lists a chamber capacity of 0.2g; the Linx Apollo lists N/A.
Camouflet Convector XL is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the Linx Apollo is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Camouflet Convector XL's spec sheet lists N/A; the Linx Apollo lists ~10 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.