Price (USD)
Boundless CFC 2.0 edgeBoundless CFC 2.0
$90
Modul
$350
Boundless CFC 2.0 is typically around $260 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Boundless CFC 2.0
Boundless Technology from $59.95
Modul
Stündenglass $350
Boundless CFC 2.0 and Modul are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Boundless CFC 2.0 is usually the lower-cost pick at $90, around $260 below Modul. Modul has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
17%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Boundless CFC 2.0
$90
Modul
$350
Boundless CFC 2.0 is typically around $260 lower.
Boundless CFC 2.0
~30 seconds
Modul
~15 Seconds
Modul has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Boundless CFC 2.0
~85g
Modul
387.5g
Boundless CFC 2.0 is the lighter listed unit.
Boundless CFC 2.0
Conduction
Modul
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Boundless CFC 2.0
$90
Modul
$350
Heat Up Time
Boundless CFC 2.0
~30 seconds
Modul
~15 Seconds
Temperature Range
Boundless CFC 2.0
60°C-230°C
Modul
850°F-900°F (Dry Herb Tank)
Battery Type
Boundless CFC 2.0
Internal 18650
Modul
Internal
Battery Life
Boundless CFC 2.0
12-14 sessions
Modul
<50 Sessions Depending on Usage Style
Charging
Boundless CFC 2.0
Micro USB
Modul
USB-C
Charge Time
Boundless CFC 2.0
~3 hours
Modul
~2 Hours
Dimensions
Boundless CFC 2.0
130x33x30mm
Modul
154x68x50mm
Weight
Boundless CFC 2.0
~85g
Modul
387.5g
Chamber Material
Boundless CFC 2.0
Ceramic
Modul
Quartz
Current price
$59.95
at Boundless Technology
Prices are read automatically from retailer pages and were last checked Aug 27, 2026; confirm the price at checkout. Some links are affiliate links, which support Thermal Extractions at no extra cost to you.
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Boundless CFC 2.0 | Modul |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $90 | $350 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | ~15 Seconds |
| Temperature Range | 60°C-230°C | 850°F-900°F (Dry Herb Tank) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.5g | — |
| Battery Type | Internal 18650 | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | — | 6000mAh |
| Battery Life | 12-14 sessions | <50 Sessions Depending on Usage Style |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~3 hours | ~2 Hours |
| Pass-Through Charging | No | — |
| Dimensions | 130x33x30mm | 154x68x50mm |
| Weight | ~85g | 387.5g |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | Digital |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Quartz |
| Brand | Boundless Technology | Stündenglass |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Body Material | — | Anodized Aluminum |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Display Type | — | 2.4” Color Display |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2023 |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 3 years | 2 years |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the Boundless CFC 2.0 sits at $90 while the Modul is $350, a gap of about $260 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Boundless CFC 2.0 is the cheaper option at $90 compared with $350 for the Modul, about $260 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Modul reaches session-ready temperature in ~15 Seconds, while the Boundless CFC 2.0 takes ~30 seconds. That's roughly 15 seconds quicker on the Modul, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Boundless CFC 2.0 is the lighter unit at ~85g, around 303g less than the Modul at 387.5g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Modul fully charges in ~2 Hours, ahead of ~3 hours on the Boundless CFC 2.0.
Boundless CFC 2.0 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the Modul is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Boundless CFC 2.0's spec sheet lists 12-14 sessions; the Modul lists <50 Sessions Depending on Usage Style. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.