Price (USD)
POTV Lobo edgeAUXO Celsius
$250
POTV Lobo
$160
POTV Lobo is typically around $90 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
AUXO Celsius vs POTV Lobo
AUXO Celsius
VS
POTV Lobo
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Editorial Summary
AUXO Celsius and POTV Lobo are both portable / hybrid vaporizers, but they target different priorities. POTV Lobo is usually the lower-cost pick at $160, around $90 below AUXO Celsius. AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
8%
Shared Traits
Portable Hybrid Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
AUXO Celsius edgeAUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Weight
Close callAUXO Celsius
—
POTV Lobo
150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
Heating Style
Close callAUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius
$250
vs
POTV Lobo
$160
Heating Type
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
vs
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
Heat Up Time
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
vs
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
Temperature Range
AUXO Celsius
—
vs
POTV Lobo
160-221°C (320-430°F)
Battery Type
AUXO Celsius
—
vs
POTV Lobo
Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650)
Battery Capacity
AUXO Celsius
1000mAh
vs
POTV Lobo
—
Charge Time
AUXO Celsius
1.5 hours
vs
POTV Lobo
—
Dimensions
AUXO Celsius
—
vs
POTV Lobo
8.89cm H without stem, 10.16cm H with dimpled stem, 5.4cm W, 2.85cm D
Weight
AUXO Celsius
—
vs
POTV Lobo
150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem
Power Adjustment
AUXO Celsius
Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode)
vs
POTV Lobo
Digital (LCD)
Choose AUXO Celsius if...
- You care about faster heat-up time for quicker sessions.
- You prefer a hybrid (primarily conduction) heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward conduction and discrete sessions.
Choose POTV Lobo if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($160 vs $250).
- You prefer a dynamic hybrid heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward budget and battery swap sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
22 differ 2 shared
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | POTV Lobo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $160 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | Dynamic Hybrid |
| Heat Up Time | 6-30 seconds | ~40 seconds |
| Temperature Range | — | 160-221°C (320-430°F) |
| Battery Type | — | Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650) |
| Battery Capacity | 1000mAh | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 1.5 hours | — |
| Dimensions | — | 8.89cm H without stem, 10.16cm H with dimpled stem, 5.4cm W, 2.85cm D |
| Weight | — | 150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | Digital (LCD) |
| Oven Type | Quarts | — |
| Brand | AUXO | Planet of the Vapes |
| App Support | Yes | — |
| Battery Runtime | — | Up to ~10 sessions per charge |
| Battery Tech | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | — |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Concentrates | — | Supported with included concentrate pad in the dosing capsule (use very small amounts) |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Mouthpiece Material | Zirconia | — |
| Primary Case Material | Aluminum Alloy | — |
| Warranty | — | 2 years through POTV |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the AUXO Celsius and the POTV Lobo?
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: AUXO Celsius runs hybrid (primarily conduction) while POTV Lobo runs dynamic hybrid. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Which is cheaper, the AUXO Celsius or the POTV Lobo?
POTV Lobo is the cheaper option at $160 compared with $250 for the AUXO Celsius, about $90 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Which heats up faster, the AUXO Celsius or the POTV Lobo?
AUXO Celsius reaches session-ready temperature in 6-30 seconds, while the POTV Lobo takes ~40 seconds. That's roughly 22 seconds quicker on the AUXO Celsius, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
What's the difference in heating between the AUXO Celsius and the POTV Lobo?
AUXO Celsius uses hybrid (primarily conduction) heating, while the POTV Lobo uses dynamic hybrid. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Can I use concentrates with the AUXO Celsius or the POTV Lobo?
Only the AUXO Celsius supports concentrates out of the box. The POTV Lobo is dry-herb-only by design.
Which is more discreet, the AUXO Celsius or the POTV Lobo?
AUXO Celsius is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the POTV Lobo is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
How similar are the AUXO Celsius and the POTV Lobo?
Across the 24 specs we line up, they share 2 and differ on 22, an overlap of about 8%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.