Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius edgeAUXO Celsius
$250
DaVinci IQ2
$295
AUXO Celsius is typically around $45 lower.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
AUXO Celsius and DaVinci IQ2 are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. AUXO Celsius is usually the lower-cost pick at $250, around $45 below DaVinci IQ2. AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
24
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Celsius
$250
DaVinci IQ2
$295
AUXO Celsius is typically around $45 lower.
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
DaVinci IQ2
30 seconds
AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
AUXO Celsius
—
DaVinci IQ2
~160g
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
DaVinci IQ2
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius
$250
DaVinci IQ2
$295
Device Type
AUXO Celsius
Portable
DaVinci IQ2
—
Heating Type
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
DaVinci IQ2
Conduction
Heat Up Time
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
DaVinci IQ2
30 seconds
Temperature Range
AUXO Celsius
—
DaVinci IQ2
0°C - 221°C
Chamber Capacity
AUXO Celsius
—
DaVinci IQ2
~0.5g
Battery Type
AUXO Celsius
—
DaVinci IQ2
Removable 18650 battery
Battery Capacity
AUXO Celsius
1000mAh
DaVinci IQ2
—
Battery Life
AUXO Celsius
—
DaVinci IQ2
~1 hour
Charging
AUXO Celsius
USB-C
DaVinci IQ2
Micro USB
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (24 differences, 0 overlaps)
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | DaVinci IQ2 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $250 | $295 |
| Device Type diff | Portable | — |
| Heating Type diff | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time diff | 6-30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Temperature Range diff | — | 0°C - 221°C |
| Chamber Capacity diff | — | ~0.5g |
| Battery Type diff | — | Removable 18650 battery |
| Battery Capacity diff | 1000mAh | — |
| Battery Life diff | — | ~1 hour |
| Charging diff | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time diff | 1.5 hours | ~6 hours |
| Pass-Through Charging diff | — | Yes |
| Dimensions diff | — | 92x45x25mm |
| Weight diff | — | ~160g |
| Power Adjustment diff | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | Digital Control |
| Oven Type diff | Quarts | Ceramic |
| Brand diff | AUXO | DaVinci Tech |
| App Support diff | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech diff | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity diff | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | — |
| Concentrate Support diff | Yes | — |
| Haptic Feedback diff | Yes | — |
| Mouthpiece Material diff | Zirconia | — |
| Primary Case Material diff | Aluminum Alloy | — |
Neither is universally better. AUXO Celsius fits some priorities, while DaVinci IQ2 fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
AUXO Celsius is listed lower ($250) compared with DaVinci IQ2 ($295), but live retailer pricing can change.
AUXO Celsius has the faster listed heat-up time (6-30 seconds) versus DaVinci IQ2 (30 seconds).
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.