Price (USD)
Linx Eden edgeAUXO Calent
$120
Linx Eden
$100
Linx Eden is typically around $20 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AUXO Calent
AUXO $120
Linx Eden
Linx Vapor $100
AUXO Calent and Linx Eden are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Linx Eden is usually the lower-cost pick at $100, around $20 below AUXO Calent. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
23
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Calent
$120
Linx Eden
$100
Linx Eden is typically around $20 lower.
AUXO Calent
134g
Linx Eden
116 grams
Linx Eden is the lighter listed unit.
AUXO Calent
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
Linx Eden
Convection
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Calent
$120
Linx Eden
$100
Heating Type
AUXO Calent
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
Linx Eden
Convection
Temperature Range
AUXO Calent
180°C - 220°C (356°F - 428°F)
Linx Eden
360°F - 430°F (182°C - 221°C)
Chamber Capacity
AUXO Calent
0.3g
Linx Eden
0.15g - 0.25g
Battery Type
AUXO Calent
Lithium-ion
Linx Eden
Internal
Battery Capacity
AUXO Calent
2900mAh
Linx Eden
2500mAh
Charging
AUXO Calent
USB-C
Linx Eden
Micro USB
Charge Time
AUXO Calent
2.5 hours
Linx Eden
3 - 4 hours
Dimensions
AUXO Calent
106.1x45x25mm
Linx Eden
24 x 130mm
Weight
AUXO Calent
134g
Linx Eden
116 grams
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AUXO Calent | Linx Eden |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $120 | $100 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | Convection |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 180°C - 220°C (356°F - 428°F) | 360°F - 430°F (182°C - 221°C) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.3g | 0.15g - 0.25g |
| Battery Type | Lithium-ion | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 2900mAh | 2500mAh |
| Battery Life | ~20 sessions | — |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hours | 3 - 4 hours |
| Bluetooth / App | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | 106.1x45x25mm | 24 x 130mm |
| Weight | 134g | 116 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | 4 Preset Modes |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Ceramic & Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | No | — |
| Brand | AUXO | Linx Vapor |
| Body Material | Aluminum Alloy | — |
| Country of Manufacture | China | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Mouthpiece Material | Zirconia | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2019 |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: AUXO Calent runs hybrid (primarily conduction) while Linx Eden runs convection. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Linx Eden is the cheaper option at $100 compared with $120 for the AUXO Calent, about $20 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
AUXO Calent uses hybrid (primarily conduction) heating, while the Linx Eden uses convection. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
AUXO Calent has the larger chamber at 0.3g, versus 0.15g - 0.25g on the Linx Eden. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Linx Eden is the lighter unit at 116 grams, around 18g less than the AUXO Calent at 134g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
AUXO Calent fully charges in 2.5 hours, ahead of 3 - 4 hours on the Linx Eden.
AUXO Calent charges over USB-C; the Linx Eden uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.