Price (USD)
AUXO Calent edgeAUXO Calent
$120
Linx Apollo
$260
AUXO Calent is typically around $140 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AUXO Calent
AUXO $120
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
AUXO Calent and Linx Apollo are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. AUXO Calent is usually the lower-cost pick at $120, around $140 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
25
Different Specs
23
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
8%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Calent
$120
Linx Apollo
$260
AUXO Calent is typically around $140 lower.
AUXO Calent
134g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
AUXO Calent is the lighter listed unit.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Calent
$120
Linx Apollo
$260
Temperature Range
AUXO Calent
180°C - 220°C (356°F - 428°F)
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Chamber Capacity
AUXO Calent
0.3g
Linx Apollo
N/A
Battery Type
AUXO Calent
Lithium-ion
Linx Apollo
Internal
Battery Capacity
AUXO Calent
2900mAh
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
Battery Life
AUXO Calent
~20 sessions
Linx Apollo
~10 sessions
Charging
AUXO Calent
USB-C
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Charge Time
AUXO Calent
2.5 hours
Linx Apollo
3-4 hours
Dimensions
AUXO Calent
106.1x45x25mm
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Weight
AUXO Calent
134g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AUXO Calent | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $120 | $260 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | — |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 180°C - 220°C (356°F - 428°F) | 220°F - 428°F |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.3g | N/A |
| Battery Type | Lithium-ion | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 2900mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | ~20 sessions | ~10 sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hours | 3-4 hours |
| Bluetooth / App | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | 106.1x45x25mm | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | 134g | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | No | Yes |
| Brand | AUXO | Linx Vapor |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | Yes |
| Body Material | Aluminum Alloy | — |
| Country of Manufacture | China | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Mouthpiece Material | Zirconia | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | — |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the AUXO Calent sits at $120 while the Linx Apollo is $260, a gap of about $140 that puts them in different buying brackets.
AUXO Calent is the cheaper option at $120 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $140 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
AUXO Calent is the lighter unit at 134g, around 16g less than the Linx Apollo at 150 grams. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Only the Linx Apollo supports concentrates out of the box. The AUXO Calent is dry-herb-only by design.
AUXO Calent lists a chamber capacity of 0.3g; the Linx Apollo lists N/A.
AUXO Calent fully charges in 2.5 hours, ahead of 3-4 hours on the Linx Apollo.
AUXO Calent is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the Linx Apollo is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.