Price (USD)
Close callAtmos Jump
$65
XMAX Tunke
$50
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Atmos Jump
AtmosRx $65
XMAX Tunke
XMAX $50
Atmos Jump and XMAX Tunke are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($65 vs $50). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
5%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Atmos Jump
$65
XMAX Tunke
$50
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Atmos Jump
Convection
XMAX Tunke
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Atmos Jump
$65
XMAX Tunke
$50
Heating Type
Atmos Jump
Convection
XMAX Tunke
Conduction
Temperature Range
Atmos Jump
392°F (fixed)
XMAX Tunke
260°C - 380°C (500°F - 716°F)
Battery Type
Atmos Jump
Lithium-ion
XMAX Tunke
Internal
Battery Capacity
Atmos Jump
1200mAh
XMAX Tunke
650mAh
Charging
Atmos Jump
Micro USB
XMAX Tunke
USB-C
Power Adjustment
Atmos Jump
Modular
XMAX Tunke
Modular - 5 Stages
Chamber Material
Atmos Jump
Stainless Steel
XMAX Tunke
Quartz
Brand
Atmos Jump
AtmosRx
XMAX Tunke
XMAX
Session Style
Atmos Jump
Session
XMAX Tunke
Both
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Atmos Jump | XMAX Tunke |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $65 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~60 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 392°F (fixed) | 260°C - 380°C (500°F - 716°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.2g | — |
| Battery Type | Lithium-ion | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 1200mAh | 650mAh |
| Battery Life | ~30-40 minutes | — |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~4 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 145x17mm | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular | Modular - 5 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | AtmosRx | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2023 |
| Session Style | Session | Both |
| Session Time | — | 15 seconds |
| Warranty | 1 year | 6 months |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Atmos Jump runs convection while XMAX Tunke runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Atmos Jump uses convection heating, while the XMAX Tunke uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Listed prices are close: $65 for the Atmos Jump versus $50 for the XMAX Tunke. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Atmos Jump controls heat with modular, while the XMAX Tunke uses modular - 5 stages. Both let you change temperature, just with different levels of precision.
Atmos Jump is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX Tunke is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
XMAX Tunke charges over USB-C; the Atmos Jump uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.