Price (USD)
Close callAtmos Jump
$65
Flowermate Aura
$65
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Atmos Jump
AtmosRx $65
Flowermate Aura
Flowermate $65
Atmos Jump and Flowermate Aura are both discrete / portable vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($65 vs $65). Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
18
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
18%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Atmos Jump
$65
Flowermate Aura
$65
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Atmos Jump
~60 seconds
Flowermate Aura
~60 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Atmos Jump
Convection
Flowermate Aura
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Heating Type
Atmos Jump
Convection
Flowermate Aura
Conduction
Temperature Range
Atmos Jump
392°F (fixed)
Flowermate Aura
40 - 230°C
Battery Type
Atmos Jump
Lithium-ion
Flowermate Aura
Internal
Battery Capacity
Atmos Jump
1200mAh
Flowermate Aura
2600mAh
Battery Life
Atmos Jump
~30-40 minutes
Flowermate Aura
~2 hours
Charge Time
Atmos Jump
~4 hours
Flowermate Aura
3-4 hours
Dimensions
Atmos Jump
145x17mm
Flowermate Aura
14.7 x 2.8 cm
Power Adjustment
Atmos Jump
Modular
Flowermate Aura
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
Atmos Jump
Stainless Steel
Flowermate Aura
Ceramic
Brand
Atmos Jump
AtmosRx
Flowermate Aura
Flowermate
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Atmos Jump | Flowermate Aura |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $65 | $65 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~60 seconds | ~60 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 392°F (fixed) | 40 - 230°C |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.2g | — |
| Battery Type | Lithium-ion | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 1200mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | ~30-40 minutes | ~2 hours |
| Charging | Micro USB | — |
| Charge Time | ~4 hours | 3-4 hours |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | 145x17mm | 14.7 x 2.8 cm |
| Weight | — | ~103g |
| Power Adjustment | Modular | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Ceramic |
| Brand | AtmosRx | Flowermate |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Release Date | — | 2016 |
| Session Style | Session | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | — |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Atmos Jump runs convection while Flowermate Aura runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Atmos Jump uses convection heating, while the Flowermate Aura uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Flowermate Aura is rated for ~2 hours, ahead of ~30-40 minutes on the Atmos Jump. Real-world battery life depends on how high you set the temperature and how long sessions run.
Listed prices are close: $65 for the Atmos Jump versus $65 for the Flowermate Aura. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Heat-up times are very close: ~60 seconds on the Atmos Jump and ~60 seconds on the Flowermate Aura. The real-world difference will be hard to notice mid-session.
Atmos Jump controls heat with modular, while the Flowermate Aura uses digital (precise). Flowermate Aura gives you finer per-degree control.
Flowermate Aura fully charges in 3-4 hours, ahead of ~4 hours on the Atmos Jump.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.