Price (USD)
Linx Apollo edgeAromed 4.0
$400
Linx Apollo
$260
Linx Apollo is typically around $140 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Aromed 4.0 vs Linx Apollo
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Aromed 4.0
AroMed HQ-Vaporizer $400
VS
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
Editorial Summary
Aromed 4.0 and Linx Apollo solve similar use-cases with different tradeoffs. Linx Apollo is usually the lower-cost pick at $260, around $140 below Aromed 4.0. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
21
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Aromed 4.0
$400
Linx Apollo
$260
Device Type
Aromed 4.0
Desktop
Linx Apollo
Portable
Temperature Range
Aromed 4.0
60°C - 235°C (140°F - 455°F)
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Battery Type
Aromed 4.0
N/A
Linx Apollo
Internal
Charging
Aromed 4.0
N/A
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Power Adjustment
Aromed 4.0
Digital Control
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
Chamber Material
Aromed 4.0
Glass
Linx Apollo
Quartz
Brand
Aromed 4.0
AroMed HQ-Vaporizer
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor
Choose Aromed 4.0 if...
- You prefer a convection heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward desktop and convection sessions.
- You prefer Aromed 4.0's overall feature mix and form factor.
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($260 vs $400).
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward portable and concentrates sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
21 differ 0 shared
| Specification | Aromed 4.0 | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $400 | $260 |
| Device Type | Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | — |
| Temperature Range | 60°C - 235°C (140°F - 455°F) | 220°F - 428°F |
| Chamber Capacity | — | N/A |
| Battery Type | N/A | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | — | ~10 sessions |
| Charging | N/A | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | — | 3-4 hours |
| Dimensions | — | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | — | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | AroMed HQ-Vaporizer | Linx Vapor |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | Yes |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany | — |
| Heating Element | Halogen Bulb | — |
| Session Style | On-Demand | — |
| Warranty | — | 1 year |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the Aromed 4.0 and the Linx Apollo?
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the Linx Apollo sits at $260 while the Aromed 4.0 is $400, a gap of about $140 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Which is cheaper, the Aromed 4.0 or the Linx Apollo?
Linx Apollo is the cheaper option at $260 compared with $400 for the Aromed 4.0, about $140 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Is the Aromed 4.0 or the Linx Apollo better for home versus on-the-go use?
Linx Apollo is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the Aromed 4.0 is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
Can I set custom temperatures on the Aromed 4.0 or the Linx Apollo?
Aromed 4.0 controls heat with digital control, while the Linx Apollo uses modular - 4 stages. Aromed 4.0 gives you finer per-degree control.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.