Price (USD)
Arizer XQ2 edgeArizer XQ2
$240
Linx Apollo
$260
Arizer XQ2 is typically around $20 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Arizer XQ2
Arizer $240
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
Arizer XQ2 and Linx Apollo are both electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Arizer XQ2 is usually the lower-cost pick at $240, around $20 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
5%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Arizer XQ2
$240
Linx Apollo
$260
Arizer XQ2 is typically around $20 lower.
Arizer XQ2
~490g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Linx Apollo is the lighter listed unit.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Arizer XQ2
$240
Linx Apollo
$260
Device Type
Arizer XQ2
Desktop
Linx Apollo
Portable
Temperature Range
Arizer XQ2
50°C-260°C
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Chamber Capacity
Arizer XQ2
0.5g / 1.5g
Linx Apollo
N/A
Battery Type
Arizer XQ2
N/A
Linx Apollo
Internal
Charging
Arizer XQ2
N/A
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Dimensions
Arizer XQ2
150x150x190mm
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Weight
Arizer XQ2
~490g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Power Adjustment
Arizer XQ2
Digital
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
Chamber Material
Arizer XQ2
Glass
Linx Apollo
Quartz
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Arizer XQ2 | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $240 | $260 |
| Device Type | Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | — |
| Heat Up Time | 1-2 minutes | — |
| Temperature Range | 50°C-260°C | 220°F - 428°F |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.5g / 1.5g | N/A |
| Battery Type | N/A | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | — | ~10 sessions |
| Charging | N/A | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | — | 3-4 hours |
| Dimensions | 150x150x190mm | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | ~490g | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Arizer | Linx Vapor |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | Yes |
| Country of Manufacture | China | — |
| Heating Element | Ceramic | — |
| Release Date | 2021 | — |
| Warranty | 3 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is form factor: these aren't the same kind of device. Arizer XQ2 is a desktop, Linx Apollo is a portable. Pick based on whether you want something portable or something stationary.
Arizer XQ2 is the cheaper option at $240 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $20 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Linx Apollo is the lighter unit at 150 grams, around 340g less than the Arizer XQ2 at ~490g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Linx Apollo is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the Arizer XQ2 is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
Arizer XQ2 controls heat with digital, while the Linx Apollo uses modular - 4 stages. Arizer XQ2 gives you finer per-degree control.
Arizer XQ2 lists a chamber capacity of 0.5g / 1.5g; the Linx Apollo lists N/A.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.