Price (USD)
Arizer V Tower edgeArizer V Tower
$88
Utillian 722
$170
Arizer V Tower is typically around $82 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Arizer V Tower
Arizer $88
Utillian 722
Utillian $170
Arizer V Tower and Utillian 722 are both electronic / convection vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Arizer V Tower is usually the lower-cost pick at $88, around $82 below Utillian 722. Utillian 722 has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
20
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
5%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Arizer V Tower
$88
Utillian 722
$170
Arizer V Tower is typically around $82 lower.
Arizer V Tower
1-2 minutes
Utillian 722
~30 seconds
Utillian 722 has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Arizer V Tower
428g
Utillian 722
180g
Utillian 722 is the lighter listed unit.
Arizer V Tower
Convection
Utillian 722
Convection
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Arizer V Tower
$88
Utillian 722
$170
Device Type
Arizer V Tower
Desktop
Utillian 722
Portable
Heat Up Time
Arizer V Tower
1-2 minutes
Utillian 722
~30 seconds
Temperature Range
Arizer V Tower
50°C-250°C
Utillian 722
180°C - 225°C
Chamber Capacity
Arizer V Tower
~0.7g
Utillian 722
<0.4 grams
Battery Type
Arizer V Tower
N/A
Utillian 722
Internal
Charging
Arizer V Tower
N/A
Utillian 722
Micro-USB
Dimensions
Arizer V Tower
160x160x650
Utillian 722
111x58x28mm
Weight
Arizer V Tower
428g
Utillian 722
180g
Power Adjustment
Arizer V Tower
Digital
Utillian 722
Modular - 5 stage
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Arizer V Tower | Utillian 722 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $88 | $170 |
| Device Type | Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Convection |
| Heat Up Time | 1-2 minutes | ~30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 50°C-250°C | 180°C - 225°C |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.7g | <0.4 grams |
| Battery Type | N/A | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2300mAh |
| Battery Life | — | ~60 minutes |
| Charging | N/A | Micro-USB |
| Charge Time | — | ~2 hours |
| Dimensions | 160x160x650 | 111x58x28mm |
| Weight | 428g | 180g |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | Modular - 5 stage |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Stainless Steel |
| Brand | Arizer | Utillian |
| Country of Manufacture | China | — |
| Release Date | 2010 | — |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 3 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is form factor: these aren't the same kind of device. Arizer V Tower is a desktop, Utillian 722 is a portable. Pick based on whether you want something portable or something stationary.
Arizer V Tower is the cheaper option at $88 compared with $170 for the Utillian 722, about $82 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Utillian 722 reaches session-ready temperature in ~30 seconds, while the Arizer V Tower takes 1-2 minutes. That's roughly 60 seconds quicker on the Utillian 722, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Arizer V Tower has the larger chamber at ~0.7g, versus <0.4 grams on the Utillian 722. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Utillian 722 is the lighter unit at 180g, around 248g less than the Arizer V Tower at 428g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Utillian 722 is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the Arizer V Tower is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
Arizer V Tower controls heat with digital, while the Utillian 722 uses modular - 5 stage. Arizer V Tower gives you finer per-degree control.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.