Price (USD)
Close callArizer Solo 3
$345
PAX FLOW
$350
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Arizer Solo 3
PAX FLOW
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Arizer Solo 3 and PAX FLOW are both portable / hybrid vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($345 vs $350). Arizer Solo 3 has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
16
Different Specs
15
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
6%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Arizer Solo 3
$345
PAX FLOW
$350
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Arizer Solo 3
~15 seconds
PAX FLOW
30-45 seconds
Arizer Solo 3 has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Arizer Solo 3
—
PAX FLOW
135 grams
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
Arizer Solo 3
Hybrid
PAX FLOW
Hybrid (conduction + convection)
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Arizer Solo 3
$345
PAX FLOW
$350
Heating Type
Arizer Solo 3
Hybrid
PAX FLOW
Hybrid (conduction + convection)
Heat Up Time
Arizer Solo 3
~15 seconds
PAX FLOW
30-45 seconds
Temperature Range
Arizer Solo 3
50°C-220°C
PAX FLOW
180°C - 225°C (356°F - 437°F)
Chamber Capacity
Arizer Solo 3
—
PAX FLOW
0.25g - 0.35g
Battery Capacity
Arizer Solo 3
—
PAX FLOW
2000mAh (internal)
Battery Life
Arizer Solo 3
~3 hours
PAX FLOW
—
Charging
Arizer Solo 3
USB-C
PAX FLOW
—
Charge Time
Arizer Solo 3
—
PAX FLOW
~20 minutes to 50%, ~40 minutes to full (USB-C)
Dimensions
Arizer Solo 3
—
PAX FLOW
107mm x 34.5mm x 29mm
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Arizer Solo 3 | PAX FLOW |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $345 | $350 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid | Hybrid (conduction + convection) |
| Heat Up Time | ~15 seconds | 30-45 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 50°C-220°C | 180°C - 225°C (356°F - 437°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | — | 0.25g - 0.35g |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2000mAh (internal) |
| Battery Life | ~3 hours | — |
| Charging | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time | — | ~20 minutes to 50%, ~40 minutes to full (USB-C) |
| Dimensions | — | 107mm x 34.5mm x 29mm |
| Weight | — | 135 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | Five petal modes + Bong Mode |
| Brand | Arizer | PAX Labs |
| Run Time | — | About 5-7 sessions per charge |
| Session Length | — | 8-minute timer |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Arizer Solo 3 runs hybrid while PAX FLOW runs hybrid (conduction + convection). That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Arizer Solo 3 reaches session-ready temperature in ~15 seconds, while the PAX FLOW takes 30-45 seconds. That's roughly 23 seconds quicker on the Arizer Solo 3, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Arizer Solo 3 uses hybrid heating, while the PAX FLOW uses hybrid (conduction + convection). Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Listed prices are close: $345 for the Arizer Solo 3 versus $350 for the PAX FLOW. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Arizer Solo 3 controls heat with digital, while the PAX FLOW uses five petal modes + bong mode. Arizer Solo 3 gives you finer per-degree control.
PAX FLOW is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the Arizer Solo 3 is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.