Price (USD)
Linx Eden edgeArizer Solo 2
$120
Linx Eden
$100
Linx Eden is typically around $20 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Arizer Solo 2
Arizer $120
Linx Eden
Linx Vapor $100
Arizer Solo 2 and Linx Eden are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Linx Eden is usually the lower-cost pick at $100, around $20 below Arizer Solo 2. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
20
Different Specs
18
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
10%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Arizer Solo 2
$120
Linx Eden
$100
Linx Eden is typically around $20 lower.
Arizer Solo 2
~210g
Linx Eden
116 grams
Linx Eden is the lighter listed unit.
Arizer Solo 2
Hybrid
Linx Eden
Convection
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Arizer Solo 2
$120
Linx Eden
$100
Heating Type
Arizer Solo 2
Hybrid
Linx Eden
Convection
Temperature Range
Arizer Solo 2
50°C-220°C
Linx Eden
360°F - 430°F (182°C - 221°C)
Chamber Capacity
Arizer Solo 2
~0.3g
Linx Eden
0.15g - 0.25g
Charging
Arizer Solo 2
Proprietary DC Adapter
Linx Eden
Micro USB
Dimensions
Arizer Solo 2
114x45x35mm
Linx Eden
24 x 130mm
Weight
Arizer Solo 2
~210g
Linx Eden
116 grams
Power Adjustment
Arizer Solo 2
Digital
Linx Eden
4 Preset Modes
Chamber Material
Arizer Solo 2
Glass
Linx Eden
Ceramic & Quartz
Brand
Arizer Solo 2
Arizer
Linx Eden
Linx Vapor
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Arizer Solo 2 | Linx Eden |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $120 | $100 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid | Convection |
| Heat Up Time | ~20 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 50°C-220°C | 360°F - 430°F (182°C - 221°C) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.3g | 0.15g - 0.25g |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2500mAh |
| Battery Life | ~3 hours | — |
| Charging | Proprietary DC Adapter | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | — | 3 - 4 hours |
| Dimensions | 114x45x35mm | 24 x 130mm |
| Weight | ~210g | 116 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | 4 Preset Modes |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Ceramic & Quartz |
| Brand | Arizer | Linx Vapor |
| Country of Manufacture | China | — |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2019 |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Arizer Solo 2 runs hybrid while Linx Eden runs convection. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Linx Eden is the cheaper option at $100 compared with $120 for the Arizer Solo 2, about $20 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Arizer Solo 2 uses hybrid heating, while the Linx Eden uses convection. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Arizer Solo 2 has the larger chamber at ~0.3g, versus 0.15g - 0.25g on the Linx Eden. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Linx Eden is the lighter unit at 116 grams, around 94g less than the Arizer Solo 2 at ~210g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Arizer Solo 2 controls heat with digital, while the Linx Eden uses 4 preset modes. Arizer Solo 2 gives you finer per-degree control.
Linx Eden is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the Arizer Solo 2 is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.