Price (USD)
Arizer Go SRT edgeArizer Go SRT
$320
Frolic Thermal Extractor
$399
Arizer Go SRT is typically around $79 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Arizer Go SRT vs Frolic Thermal Extractor
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Arizer Go SRT
Arizer $320
VS
Frolic Thermal Extractor
Limelight from £399 GBP
Editorial Summary
Arizer Go SRT and Frolic Thermal Extractor are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Arizer Go SRT is usually the lower-cost pick at $320, around $79 below Frolic Thermal Extractor. Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
27
Different Specs
25
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
7%
Shared Traits
Portable Electronic Battery Swap Premium
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
Close callArizer Go SRT
5-15 seconds claimed, 15-23 seconds to 200°C in reviews
Frolic Thermal Extractor
~5 seconds (under 2 seconds to reheat)
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Weight
Close callArizer Go SRT
242 grams
Frolic Thermal Extractor
245g
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
Heating Style
Close callArizer Go SRT
Ceramic hybrid (75% convection, 25% conduction)
Frolic Thermal Extractor
Convection
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Arizer Go SRT
$320
Frolic Thermal Extractor
$399
Heating Type
Arizer Go SRT
Ceramic hybrid (75% convection, 25% conduction)
Frolic Thermal Extractor
Convection
Heat Up Time
Arizer Go SRT
5-15 seconds claimed, 15-23 seconds to 200°C in reviews
Frolic Thermal Extractor
~5 seconds (under 2 seconds to reheat)
Temperature Range
Arizer Go SRT
50-220°C (122-428°F) in 1 degree steps
Frolic Thermal Extractor
40°C - 240°C (session mode up to 220°C)
Chamber Capacity
Arizer Go SRT
Up to 0.3g
Frolic Thermal Extractor
~0.25g
Battery Type
Arizer Go SRT
21700 (user replaceable)
Frolic Thermal Extractor
Removable 21700
Battery Life
Arizer Go SRT
50-60 minutes, about 10 to 12 sessions
Frolic Thermal Extractor
~13 sessions
Charging
Arizer Go SRT
USB-C Power Delivery
Frolic Thermal Extractor
USB-C
Charge Time
Arizer Go SRT
~2 hours to full, ~15 minutes for 20 percent
Frolic Thermal Extractor
~1 hour 40 minutes
Dimensions
Arizer Go SRT
110 x 60 x 30mm
Frolic Thermal Extractor
105x63x24mm
Choose Arizer Go SRT if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($320 vs $399).
- You prefer a ceramic hybrid (75% convection, 25% conduction) heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward hybrid and glass sessions.
Typical price
$320
Sold by To the Cloud Vapor Store
Choose Frolic Thermal Extractor if...
- You prefer a convection heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward convection and adjustable airflow sessions.
- You prefer Frolic Thermal Extractor's overall feature mix and form factor.
Current price
£399GBP
at Limelight
Prices are read automatically from retailer pages and were last checked Aug 27, 2026; confirm the price at checkout. Some links are affiliate links, which support Thermal Extractions at no extra cost to you.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
25 differ 2 shared
| Specification | Arizer Go SRT | Frolic Thermal Extractor |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $320 | $399 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Ceramic hybrid (75% convection, 25% conduction) | Convection |
| Heat Up Time | 5-15 seconds claimed, 15-23 seconds to 200°C in reviews | ~5 seconds (under 2 seconds to reheat) |
| Temperature Range | 50-220°C (122-428°F) in 1 degree steps | 40°C - 240°C (session mode up to 220°C) |
| Chamber Capacity | Up to 0.3g | ~0.25g |
| Battery Type | 21700 (user replaceable) | Removable 21700 |
| Battery Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh |
| Battery Life | 50-60 minutes, about 10 to 12 sessions | ~13 sessions |
| Charging | USB-C Power Delivery | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~2 hours to full, ~15 minutes for 20 percent | ~1 hour 40 minutes |
| Pass-Through Charging | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | 110 x 60 x 30mm | 105x63x24mm |
| Weight | 242 grams | 245g |
| Power Adjustment | Digital, three editable presets storing temperature and heat time | Digital |
| Chamber Material | Borosilicate glass (Go Shell or Go Glass Aroma Tube) | Anodized Aluminum |
| Brand | Arizer | Limelight |
| Adjustable Airflow | No | Yes |
| Auto Shut Off | 20, 40 or 60 minutes | — |
| Country of Manufacture | Canada | — |
| Display Type | Colour display with auto-rotate | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Manufacturer | Arizer, Waterloo, Ontario | — |
| Release Date | 2026 | 2025 |
| Session Style | Both (heat time adjustable from 20 seconds to 5 minutes) | Both |
| Warranty | Lifetime on the heating element, 2 years on the device, 1 year on the battery, glass not covered | 2 years |
| Water Pipe Adapter | Go WPA included (14mm) | — |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the Arizer Go SRT and the Frolic Thermal Extractor?
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Arizer Go SRT runs ceramic hybrid (75% convection, 25% conduction) while Frolic Thermal Extractor runs convection. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Which is cheaper, the Arizer Go SRT or the Frolic Thermal Extractor?
Arizer Go SRT is the cheaper option at $320 compared with $399 for the Frolic Thermal Extractor, about $79 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Which heats up faster, the Arizer Go SRT or the Frolic Thermal Extractor?
Frolic Thermal Extractor reaches session-ready temperature in ~5 seconds (under 2 seconds to reheat), while the Arizer Go SRT takes 5-15 seconds claimed, 15-23 seconds to 200°C in reviews. That's roughly 5 seconds quicker on the Frolic Thermal Extractor, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
What's the difference in heating between the Arizer Go SRT and the Frolic Thermal Extractor?
Arizer Go SRT uses ceramic hybrid (75% convection, 25% conduction) heating, while the Frolic Thermal Extractor uses convection. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Does the Arizer Go SRT or the Frolic Thermal Extractor hold more flower?
Arizer Go SRT has the larger chamber at Up to 0.3g, versus ~0.25g on the Frolic Thermal Extractor. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Which charges faster, the Arizer Go SRT or the Frolic Thermal Extractor?
Frolic Thermal Extractor fully charges in ~1 hour 40 minutes, ahead of ~2 hours to full, ~15 minutes for 20 percent on the Arizer Go SRT.
What battery life can I expect from the Arizer Go SRT and the Frolic Thermal Extractor?
Arizer Go SRT's spec sheet lists 50-60 minutes, about 10 to 12 sessions; the Frolic Thermal Extractor lists ~13 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.