Price (USD)
Close callArizer Extreme Q
$160
Utillian 722
$170
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Arizer Extreme Q
Arizer $160
Utillian 722
Utillian $170
Arizer Extreme Q and Utillian 722 are both convection / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($160 vs $170). Utillian 722 has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Arizer Extreme Q
$160
Utillian 722
$170
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Arizer Extreme Q
2-3 minutes
Utillian 722
~30 seconds
Utillian 722 has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Arizer Extreme Q
442g
Utillian 722
180g
Utillian 722 is the lighter listed unit.
Arizer Extreme Q
Convection
Utillian 722
Convection
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Arizer Extreme Q
$160
Utillian 722
$170
Device Type
Arizer Extreme Q
Desktop
Utillian 722
Portable
Heat Up Time
Arizer Extreme Q
2-3 minutes
Utillian 722
~30 seconds
Temperature Range
Arizer Extreme Q
50°C-250°C
Utillian 722
180°C - 225°C
Chamber Capacity
Arizer Extreme Q
~0.7g
Utillian 722
<0.4 grams
Battery Type
Arizer Extreme Q
N/A
Utillian 722
Internal
Charging
Arizer Extreme Q
N/A
Utillian 722
Micro-USB
Dimensions
Arizer Extreme Q
160x160x65mm
Utillian 722
111x58x28mm
Weight
Arizer Extreme Q
442g
Utillian 722
180g
Power Adjustment
Arizer Extreme Q
Digital Control
Utillian 722
Modular - 5 stage
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Arizer Extreme Q | Utillian 722 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $160 | $170 |
| Device Type | Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Convection |
| Heat Up Time | 2-3 minutes | ~30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 50°C-250°C | 180°C - 225°C |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.7g | <0.4 grams |
| Battery Type | N/A | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2300mAh |
| Battery Life | — | ~60 minutes |
| Charging | N/A | Micro-USB |
| Charge Time | — | ~2 hours |
| Dimensions | 160x160x65mm | 111x58x28mm |
| Weight | 442g | 180g |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control | Modular - 5 stage |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Stainless Steel |
| Brand | Arizer | Utillian |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Country of Manufacture | China | — |
| Heating Element | Ceramic | — |
| Release Date | 2010 | — |
| Remote Control | Yes | — |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 3 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is form factor: these aren't the same kind of device. Arizer Extreme Q is a desktop, Utillian 722 is a portable. Pick based on whether you want something portable or something stationary.
Utillian 722 reaches session-ready temperature in ~30 seconds, while the Arizer Extreme Q takes 2-3 minutes. That's roughly 120 seconds quicker on the Utillian 722, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Arizer Extreme Q has the larger chamber at ~0.7g, versus <0.4 grams on the Utillian 722. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Utillian 722 is the lighter unit at 180g, around 262g less than the Arizer Extreme Q at 442g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Utillian 722 is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the Arizer Extreme Q is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
Listed prices are close: $160 for the Arizer Extreme Q versus $170 for the Utillian 722. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Arizer Extreme Q controls heat with digital control, while the Utillian 722 uses modular - 5 stage. Arizer Extreme Q gives you finer per-degree control.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.