Price (USD)
Arizer Extreme Q edgeArizer Extreme Q
$160
PAX FLOW
$350
Arizer Extreme Q is typically around $190 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Arizer Extreme Q
Arizer $160
PAX FLOW
PAX Labs $350
Arizer Extreme Q and PAX FLOW are both electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Arizer Extreme Q is usually the lower-cost pick at $160, around $190 below PAX FLOW. PAX FLOW has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
24
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Arizer Extreme Q
$160
PAX FLOW
$350
Arizer Extreme Q is typically around $190 lower.
Arizer Extreme Q
2-3 minutes
PAX FLOW
30-45 seconds
PAX FLOW has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Arizer Extreme Q
442g
PAX FLOW
135 grams
PAX FLOW is the lighter listed unit.
Arizer Extreme Q
Convection
PAX FLOW
Hybrid (conduction + convection)
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Arizer Extreme Q
$160
PAX FLOW
$350
Device Type
Arizer Extreme Q
Desktop
PAX FLOW
Portable
Heating Type
Arizer Extreme Q
Convection
PAX FLOW
Hybrid (conduction + convection)
Heat Up Time
Arizer Extreme Q
2-3 minutes
PAX FLOW
30-45 seconds
Temperature Range
Arizer Extreme Q
50°C-250°C
PAX FLOW
180°C - 225°C (356°F - 437°F)
Chamber Capacity
Arizer Extreme Q
~0.7g
PAX FLOW
0.25g - 0.35g
Battery Type
Arizer Extreme Q
N/A
PAX FLOW
Internal
Charging
Arizer Extreme Q
N/A
PAX FLOW
USB-C
Dimensions
Arizer Extreme Q
160x160x65mm
PAX FLOW
107mm x 34.5mm x 29mm
Weight
Arizer Extreme Q
442g
PAX FLOW
135 grams
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Arizer Extreme Q | PAX FLOW |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $160 | $350 |
| Device Type | Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Hybrid (conduction + convection) |
| Heat Up Time | 2-3 minutes | 30-45 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 50°C-250°C | 180°C - 225°C (356°F - 437°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.7g | 0.25g - 0.35g |
| Battery Type | N/A | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2000mAh (internal) |
| Battery Life | — | 4-6 sessions |
| Charging | N/A | USB-C |
| Charge Time | — | ~20 minutes to 50%, ~40 minutes to full (USB-C) |
| Dimensions | 160x160x65mm | 107mm x 34.5mm x 29mm |
| Weight | 442g | 135 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control | Five petal modes + Bong Mode |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Stainless Steel |
| Brand | Arizer | PAX Labs |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | No |
| Country of Manufacture | China | — |
| Heating Element | Ceramic | — |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2025 |
| Remote Control | Yes | — |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Session Timer | — | 8 minutes |
| Warranty | 3 years | 2 years |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the Arizer Extreme Q sits at $160 while the PAX FLOW is $350, a gap of about $190 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Arizer Extreme Q is the cheaper option at $160 compared with $350 for the PAX FLOW, about $190 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
PAX FLOW reaches session-ready temperature in 30-45 seconds, while the Arizer Extreme Q takes 2-3 minutes. That's roughly 113 seconds quicker on the PAX FLOW, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Arizer Extreme Q uses convection heating, while the PAX FLOW uses hybrid (conduction + convection). Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Arizer Extreme Q has the larger chamber at ~0.7g, versus 0.25g - 0.35g on the PAX FLOW. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
PAX FLOW is the lighter unit at 135 grams, around 307g less than the Arizer Extreme Q at 442g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
PAX FLOW is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the Arizer Extreme Q is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.