Price (USD)
Arizer Extreme Q edgeArizer Extreme Q
$160
Linx Apollo
$260
Arizer Extreme Q is typically around $100 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Arizer Extreme Q
Arizer $160
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
Arizer Extreme Q and Linx Apollo are both electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Arizer Extreme Q is usually the lower-cost pick at $160, around $100 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Arizer Extreme Q
$160
Linx Apollo
$260
Arizer Extreme Q is typically around $100 lower.
Arizer Extreme Q
442g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Linx Apollo is the lighter listed unit.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Arizer Extreme Q
$160
Linx Apollo
$260
Device Type
Arizer Extreme Q
Desktop
Linx Apollo
Portable
Temperature Range
Arizer Extreme Q
50°C-250°C
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Chamber Capacity
Arizer Extreme Q
~0.7g
Linx Apollo
N/A
Battery Type
Arizer Extreme Q
N/A
Linx Apollo
Internal
Charging
Arizer Extreme Q
N/A
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Dimensions
Arizer Extreme Q
160x160x65mm
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Weight
Arizer Extreme Q
442g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Power Adjustment
Arizer Extreme Q
Digital Control
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
Chamber Material
Arizer Extreme Q
Glass
Linx Apollo
Quartz
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Arizer Extreme Q | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $160 | $260 |
| Device Type | Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | — |
| Heat Up Time | 2-3 minutes | — |
| Temperature Range | 50°C-250°C | 220°F - 428°F |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.7g | N/A |
| Battery Type | N/A | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | — | ~10 sessions |
| Charging | N/A | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | — | 3-4 hours |
| Dimensions | 160x160x65mm | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | 442g | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Arizer | Linx Vapor |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | Yes |
| Country of Manufacture | China | — |
| Heating Element | Ceramic | — |
| Release Date | 2010 | — |
| Remote Control | Yes | — |
| Warranty | 3 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the Arizer Extreme Q sits at $160 while the Linx Apollo is $260, a gap of about $100 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Arizer Extreme Q is the cheaper option at $160 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $100 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Linx Apollo is the lighter unit at 150 grams, around 292g less than the Arizer Extreme Q at 442g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Linx Apollo is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the Arizer Extreme Q is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
Arizer Extreme Q controls heat with digital control, while the Linx Apollo uses modular - 4 stages. Arizer Extreme Q gives you finer per-degree control.
Arizer Extreme Q lists a chamber capacity of ~0.7g; the Linx Apollo lists N/A.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.