Skip to content

Vaporizer Comparison

Arizer Air SE vs Linx Apollo

Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.

Arizer Air SE

Arizer Air SE

Arizer $90

VS
Linx Apollo

Linx Apollo

Linx Vapor $260

Editorial Summary

Arizer Air SE and Linx Apollo are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Arizer Air SE is usually the lower-cost pick at $90, around $170 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.

Specs Compared

23

Different Specs

20

Shared Specs

3

Overall Overlap

13%

Shared Traits

Portable Electronic

Head-to-Head Highlights

A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.

Price (USD)

Arizer Air SE edge

Arizer Air SE

$90

Linx Apollo

$260

Arizer Air SE is typically around $170 lower.

Key Differences at a Glance

Top specs where these two devices diverge.

8 differences

Price (USD)

Arizer Air SE

$90

Linx Apollo

$260

Temperature Range

Arizer Air SE

180°C-210°C

Linx Apollo

220°F - 428°F

Chamber Capacity

Arizer Air SE

~0.25 grams

Linx Apollo

N/A

Battery Type

Arizer Air SE

Swappable 18650

Linx Apollo

Internal

Battery Life

Arizer Air SE

~80 minutes

Linx Apollo

~10 sessions

Power Adjustment

Arizer Air SE

Preset - 5 Stages

Linx Apollo

Modular - 4 Stages

Chamber Material

Arizer Air SE

Glass

Linx Apollo

Quartz

Brand

Arizer Air SE

Arizer

Linx Apollo

Linx Vapor

Choose Arizer Air SE if...

  • You want the lower listed entry price ($90 vs $260).
  • You prefer a hybrid heating profile.
  • Your usage leans toward battery swap and hybrid sessions.
View Arizer Air SE Profile

Choose Linx Apollo if...

  • You prefer a — heating profile.
  • Your usage leans toward concentrates sessions.
  • You prefer Linx Apollo's overall feature mix and form factor.
View Linx Apollo Profile

Spec Comparison Table

Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.

20 differ 3 shared
SpecificationArizer Air SELinx Apollo
Price (USD) $90$260
Device Type PortablePortable
Heating Type Hybrid
Heat Up Time ~1 minute
Temperature Range 180°C-210°C220°F - 428°F
Chamber Capacity ~0.25 gramsN/A
Battery Type Swappable 18650Internal
Battery Capacity 2600mAh
Battery Life ~80 minutes~10 sessions
Charging Micro USBMicro USB
Charge Time 3-4 hours
Dimensions 60 x 40 x 40mm
Weight 150 grams
Power Adjustment Preset - 5 StagesModular - 4 Stages
Chamber Material GlassQuartz
Concentrate Support Yes
Brand ArizerLinx Vapor
Adjustable Airflow Yes
Country of Manufacture China
Heating Element Ceramic
Release Date 2023
Session Style Session
Warranty 1 year1 year

Comparison FAQs

What is the biggest difference between the Arizer Air SE and the Linx Apollo?

The biggest practical difference is price tier: the Arizer Air SE sits at $90 while the Linx Apollo is $260, a gap of about $170 that puts them in different buying brackets.

Which is cheaper, the Arizer Air SE or the Linx Apollo?

Arizer Air SE is the cheaper option at $90 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $170 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.

Can I swap the batteries on the Arizer Air SE or the Linx Apollo?

Arizer Air SE uses swappable 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The Linx Apollo has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.

How much flower do the Arizer Air SE and Linx Apollo hold?

Arizer Air SE lists a chamber capacity of ~0.25 grams; the Linx Apollo lists N/A.

What battery life can I expect from the Arizer Air SE and the Linx Apollo?

Arizer Air SE's spec sheet lists ~80 minutes; the Linx Apollo lists ~10 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.

How similar are the Arizer Air SE and the Linx Apollo?

Across the 23 specs we line up, they share 3 and differ on 20, an overlap of about 13%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.

Need a different matchup?

Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.