Price (USD)
Arizer Air Max edgeArizer Air Max
$240
Linx Apollo
$260
Arizer Air Max is typically around $20 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Arizer Air Max
Arizer $240
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
Arizer Air Max and Linx Apollo are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Arizer Air Max is usually the lower-cost pick at $240, around $20 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
23
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Arizer Air Max
$240
Linx Apollo
$260
Arizer Air Max is typically around $20 lower.
Arizer Air Max
~160 grams
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Linx Apollo is the lighter listed unit.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Arizer Air Max
$240
Linx Apollo
$260
Temperature Range
Arizer Air Max
50°C-220°C
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Chamber Capacity
Arizer Air Max
~0.25 grams
Linx Apollo
N/A
Battery Type
Arizer Air Max
Swappable 26650
Linx Apollo
Internal
Battery Capacity
Arizer Air Max
5750mAh
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
Battery Life
Arizer Air Max
~135 minutes
Linx Apollo
~10 sessions
Charging
Arizer Air Max
USB-C
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Charge Time
Arizer Air Max
~3 hours
Linx Apollo
3-4 hours
Dimensions
Arizer Air Max
125x25mm
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Weight
Arizer Air Max
~160 grams
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Arizer Air Max | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $240 | $260 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid | — |
| Heat Up Time | ~1 minute | — |
| Temperature Range | 50°C-220°C | 220°F - 428°F |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.25 grams | N/A |
| Battery Type | Swappable 26650 | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 5750mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | ~135 minutes | ~10 sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~3 hours | 3-4 hours |
| Pass-Through Charging | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | 125x25mm | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | ~160 grams | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Arizer | Linx Vapor |
| Adjustable Airflow | No | Yes |
| Country of Manufacture | China | — |
| Heating Element | Ceramic | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | — |
| Session Style | Both | — |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 23 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
Arizer Air Max is the cheaper option at $240 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $20 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Arizer Air Max uses swappable 26650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The Linx Apollo has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Arizer Air Max controls heat with digital control, while the Linx Apollo uses modular - 4 stages. Arizer Air Max gives you finer per-degree control.
Arizer Air Max lists a chamber capacity of ~0.25 grams; the Linx Apollo lists N/A.
Arizer Air Max fully charges in ~3 hours, ahead of 3-4 hours on the Linx Apollo.
Arizer Air Max's spec sheet lists ~135 minutes; the Linx Apollo lists ~10 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.