Price (USD)
Linx Apollo edgeAirVape Enso
$420
Linx Apollo
$260
Linx Apollo is typically around $160 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AirVape Enso
Apollo AirVape $420
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
AirVape Enso and Linx Apollo are both portable / concentrates vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Linx Apollo is usually the lower-cost pick at $260, around $160 below AirVape Enso. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
5%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AirVape Enso
$420
Linx Apollo
$260
Linx Apollo is typically around $160 lower.
AirVape Enso
2.55 kg
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Linx Apollo is the lighter listed unit.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AirVape Enso
$420
Linx Apollo
$260
Device Type
AirVape Enso
Portable Desktop
Linx Apollo
Portable
Temperature Range
AirVape Enso
180°C-330°C
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Chamber Capacity
AirVape Enso
3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup)
Linx Apollo
N/A
Battery Type
AirVape Enso
Removable Proprietary Battery
Linx Apollo
Internal
Battery Capacity
AirVape Enso
5000mAh
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
Battery Life
AirVape Enso
2 hours
Linx Apollo
~10 sessions
Charging
AirVape Enso
USB-C
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Charge Time
AirVape Enso
3.5 hours
Linx Apollo
3-4 hours
Dimensions
AirVape Enso
33x12cm
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AirVape Enso | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $420 | $260 |
| Device Type | Portable Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | — |
| Temperature Range | 180°C-330°C | 220°F - 428°F |
| Chamber Capacity | 3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup) | N/A |
| Battery Type | Removable Proprietary Battery | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 5000mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | 2 hours | ~10 sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | 3.5 hours | 3-4 hours |
| Dimensions | 33x12cm | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | 2.55 kg | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Single Knob | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Yes |
| Brand | Apollo AirVape | Linx Vapor |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | Yes |
| Body Material | Zinc Alloy | — |
| Mouthpiece Material | Stainless Steel | — |
| Warranty | Lifetime | 1 year |
| Water Capacity | 200mL | — |
| Water Filtration | Yes | — |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the Linx Apollo sits at $260 while the AirVape Enso is $420, a gap of about $160 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Linx Apollo is the cheaper option at $260 compared with $420 for the AirVape Enso, about $160 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Linx Apollo is the lighter unit at 150 grams, around 2400g less than the AirVape Enso at 2.55 kg. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
AirVape Enso is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the Linx Apollo is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
AirVape Enso uses removable proprietary battery, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The Linx Apollo has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
AirVape Enso lists a chamber capacity of 3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup); the Linx Apollo lists N/A.
AirVape Enso's spec sheet lists 2 hours; the Linx Apollo lists ~10 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.