Price (USD)
The Wand edgeAirVape Enso
$420
The Wand
$130
The Wand is typically around $290 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AirVape Enso
Apollo AirVape $420
The Wand
Ispire $130
AirVape Enso and The Wand are both portable / concentrates vaporizers, but they target different priorities. The Wand is usually the lower-cost pick at $130, around $290 below AirVape Enso. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
9%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AirVape Enso
$420
The Wand
$130
The Wand is typically around $290 lower.
AirVape Enso
Conduction
The Wand
Induction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AirVape Enso
$420
The Wand
$130
Device Type
AirVape Enso
Portable Desktop
The Wand
Portable
Heating Type
AirVape Enso
Conduction
The Wand
Induction
Temperature Range
AirVape Enso
180°C-330°C
The Wand
450°F - 800°F
Battery Type
AirVape Enso
Removable Proprietary Battery
The Wand
Dual Replaceable 18650
Power Adjustment
AirVape Enso
Single Knob
The Wand
Digital
Chamber Material
AirVape Enso
Ceramic
The Wand
Borosilicate Glass
Brand
AirVape Enso
Apollo AirVape
The Wand
Ispire
Warranty
AirVape Enso
Lifetime
The Wand
1 year
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AirVape Enso | The Wand |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $420 | $130 |
| Device Type | Portable Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Induction |
| Temperature Range | 180°C-330°C | 450°F - 800°F |
| Chamber Capacity | 3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup) | — |
| Battery Type | Removable Proprietary Battery | Dual Replaceable 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 5000mAh | — |
| Battery Life | 2 hours | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 3.5 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 33x12cm | — |
| Weight | 2.55 kg | — |
| Power Adjustment | Single Knob | Digital |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Borosilicate Glass |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Yes |
| Brand | Apollo AirVape | Ispire |
| Body Material | Zinc Alloy | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Mouthpiece Material | Stainless Steel | — |
| Release Date | — | 2021 |
| Warranty | Lifetime | 1 year |
| Water Capacity | 200mL | — |
| Water Filtration | Yes | — |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the The Wand sits at $130 while the AirVape Enso is $420, a gap of about $290 that puts them in different buying brackets.
The Wand is the cheaper option at $130 compared with $420 for the AirVape Enso, about $290 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
AirVape Enso uses conduction heating, while the The Wand uses induction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
AirVape Enso is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the The Wand is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
AirVape Enso controls heat with single knob, while the The Wand uses digital. The Wand gives you finer per-degree control.
Both devices support concentrate use, typically via an included or aftermarket pad or insert. Check the manual for the recommended approach for each.
Across the 23 specs we line up, they share 2 and differ on 21, an overlap of about 9%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.