Price (USD)
2-Con edge2-Con
$169
Linx Apollo
$260
2-Con is typically around $91 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
2-Con vs Linx Apollo
2-Con
VS
Linx Apollo
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Editorial Summary
2-Con and Linx Apollo are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. 2-Con is usually the lower-cost pick at $169, around $91 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
16
Different Specs
16
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Portable Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
Close call2-Con
~60 seconds
Linx Apollo
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Weight
Close call2-Con
—
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
Heating Style
Close call2-Con
Hybrid
Linx Apollo
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
2-Con
$169
vs
Linx Apollo
$260
Device Type
2-Con
Portable
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Heating Type
2-Con
Hybrid
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Heat Up Time
2-Con
~60 seconds
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Temperature Range
2-Con
32°F-455°F
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Battery Type
2-Con
Swappable 21700
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Battery Capacity
2-Con
4000mAh
vs
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
Charging
2-Con
USB-C
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Dimensions
2-Con
—
vs
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Weight
2-Con
—
vs
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Choose 2-Con if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($169 vs $260).
- You prefer a hybrid heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward budget and hybrid sessions.
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward concentrates sessions.
- You prefer Linx Apollo's overall feature mix and form factor.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
16 differ 0 shared
| Specification | 2-Con | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $169 | $260 |
| Device Type | Portable | — |
| Heating Type | Hybrid | — |
| Heat Up Time | ~60 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 32°F-455°F | — |
| Battery Type | Swappable 21700 | — |
| Battery Capacity | 4000mAh | 2600mAh |
| Charging | USB-C | — |
| Dimensions | — | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | — | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Brand | End Game Labs | Linx Vapor |
| 14mm Water Pipe Adapter | Yes | — |
| 18mm Water Pipe Adapter | Yes | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Housing Material | 6061 Aviation Aluminum Chasis | — |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the 2-Con and the Linx Apollo?
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 16 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
Which is cheaper, the 2-Con or the Linx Apollo?
2-Con is the cheaper option at $169 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $91 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Can I set custom temperatures on the 2-Con or the Linx Apollo?
2-Con controls heat with digital control, while the Linx Apollo uses modular - 4 stages. 2-Con gives you finer per-degree control.
Can I use the 2-Con or the Linx Apollo with a water pipe?
Only the 2-Con has a documented water-pipe adapter option. The Linx Apollo doesn't list one, though aftermarket adapters sometimes exist for popular models.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.