Price (USD)
XMAX Tunke edgeThe Coma
$588
XMAX Tunke
$50
XMAX Tunke is typically around $538 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
The Coma
Vices $588
XMAX Tunke
XMAX $50
The Coma and XMAX Tunke are both electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Tunke is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $538 below The Coma. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
23
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
The Coma
$588
XMAX Tunke
$50
XMAX Tunke is typically around $538 lower.
The Coma
Convection (wired ball vaporizer)
XMAX Tunke
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
The Coma
$588
XMAX Tunke
$50
Device Type
The Coma
Desktop
XMAX Tunke
Portable
Heating Type
The Coma
Convection (wired ball vaporizer)
XMAX Tunke
Conduction
Temperature Range
The Coma
200-300°C (392-572°F) recommended by Vices
XMAX Tunke
260°C - 380°C (500°F - 716°F)
Battery Type
The Coma
None
XMAX Tunke
Internal
Battery Capacity
The Coma
N/A
XMAX Tunke
650mAh
Charging
The Coma
N/A
XMAX Tunke
USB-C
Power Adjustment
The Coma
PID controller, switchable between °C and °F
XMAX Tunke
Modular - 5 Stages
Chamber Material
The Coma
Titanium Macro Bowl with an Everlasting titanium screen
XMAX Tunke
Quartz
Brand
The Coma
Vices
XMAX Tunke
XMAX
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | The Coma | XMAX Tunke |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $588 | $50 |
| Device Type | Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection (wired ball vaporizer) | Conduction |
| Temperature Range | 200-300°C (392-572°F) recommended by Vices | 260°C - 380°C (500°F - 716°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.2g to 1.6g | — |
| Battery Type | None | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | N/A | 650mAh |
| Charging | N/A | USB-C |
| Power Adjustment | PID controller, switchable between °C and °F | Modular - 5 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Titanium Macro Bowl with an Everlasting titanium screen | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Vices | XMAX |
| Coil Size | 35mm enclosed coil, wired directly to the PID | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Heater Material | Titanium with an aluminium handle and heat sync hardware | — |
| Manufacturer | Vices, Brisbane Australia | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Power Options | 110V (US and Canada) or 220V (AU, UK and EU) | — |
| Release Date | 2026 | 2023 |
| Session Style | On-Demand | Both |
| Session Time | — | 15 seconds |
| Thermal Matrix | ~3500 mixed cut ruby corundum gems, 2 to 2.5mm | — |
| Warranty | Australian Consumer Law cover, no fixed term published. Consumables excluded | 6 months |
| Water Pipe Adapter | 14mm glass joint fitted, 18mm spare included | — |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX Tunke sits at $50 while the The Coma is $588, a gap of about $538 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX Tunke is the cheaper option at $50 compared with $588 for the The Coma, about $538 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
The Coma uses convection (wired ball vaporizer) heating, while the XMAX Tunke uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
XMAX Tunke is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the The Coma is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
The Coma controls heat with pid controller, switchable between °c and °f, while the XMAX Tunke uses modular - 5 stages. Both let you change temperature, just with different levels of precision.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.