Price (USD)
Utillian 722 edgeUtillian 722
$170
The Coma
$588
Utillian 722 is typically around $418 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Utillian 722 vs The Coma
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Utillian 722
Utillian $170
VS
The Coma
Vices $588
Editorial Summary
Utillian 722 and The Coma are both convection / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Utillian 722 is usually the lower-cost pick at $170, around $418 below The Coma. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
25
Different Specs
25
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Convection Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heating Style
Close callUtillian 722
Convection
The Coma
Convection (wired ball vaporizer)
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Utillian 722
$170
The Coma
$588
Device Type
Utillian 722
Portable
The Coma
Desktop
Heating Type
Utillian 722
Convection
The Coma
Convection (wired ball vaporizer)
Temperature Range
Utillian 722
180°C - 225°C
The Coma
200-300°C (392-572°F) recommended by Vices
Chamber Capacity
Utillian 722
<0.4 grams
The Coma
0.2g to 1.6g
Battery Type
Utillian 722
Internal
The Coma
None
Battery Capacity
Utillian 722
2300mAh
The Coma
N/A
Charging
Utillian 722
Micro-USB
The Coma
N/A
Power Adjustment
Utillian 722
Modular - 5 stage
The Coma
PID controller, switchable between °C and °F
Chamber Material
Utillian 722
Aluminum
The Coma
Titanium Macro Bowl with an Everlasting titanium screen
Choose Utillian 722 if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($170 vs $588).
- You prefer a convection heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward portable and discrete sessions.
Choose The Coma if...
- You prefer a convection (wired ball vaporizer) heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward desktop and ball vape sessions.
- You prefer The Coma's overall feature mix and form factor.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
25 differ 0 shared
| Specification | Utillian 722 | The Coma |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $170 | $588 |
| Device Type | Portable | Desktop |
| Heating Type | Convection | Convection (wired ball vaporizer) |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 180°C - 225°C | 200-300°C (392-572°F) recommended by Vices |
| Chamber Capacity | <0.4 grams | 0.2g to 1.6g |
| Battery Type | Internal | None |
| Battery Capacity | 2300mAh | N/A |
| Battery Life | ~60 minutes | — |
| Charging | Micro-USB | N/A |
| Charge Time | ~2 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 111x58x28mm | — |
| Weight | 180g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 5 stage | PID controller, switchable between °C and °F |
| Chamber Material | Aluminum | Titanium Macro Bowl with an Everlasting titanium screen |
| Brand | Utillian | Vices |
| Coil Size | — | 35mm enclosed coil, wired directly to the PID |
| Heater Material | — | Titanium with an aluminium handle and heat sync hardware |
| Manufacturer | — | Vices, Brisbane Australia |
| Power Options | — | 110V (US and Canada) or 220V (AU, UK and EU) |
| Release Date | — | 2026 |
| Session Style | Session | On-Demand |
| Thermal Matrix | — | ~3500 mixed cut ruby corundum gems, 2 to 2.5mm |
| Warranty | 1 year | Australian Consumer Law cover, no fixed term published. Consumables excluded |
| Water Pipe Adapter | — | 14mm glass joint fitted, 18mm spare included |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the Utillian 722 and the The Coma?
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the Utillian 722 sits at $170 while the The Coma is $588, a gap of about $418 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Which is cheaper, the Utillian 722 or the The Coma?
Utillian 722 is the cheaper option at $170 compared with $588 for the The Coma, about $418 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
What's the difference in heating between the Utillian 722 and the The Coma?
Utillian 722 uses convection heating, while the The Coma uses convection (wired ball vaporizer). Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Does the Utillian 722 or the The Coma hold more flower?
The Coma has the larger chamber at 0.2g to 1.6g, versus <0.4 grams on the Utillian 722. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Is the Utillian 722 or the The Coma better for home versus on-the-go use?
Utillian 722 is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the The Coma is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
Can I set custom temperatures on the Utillian 722 or the The Coma?
Utillian 722 controls heat with modular - 5 stage, while the The Coma uses pid controller, switchable between °c and °f. Both let you change temperature, just with different levels of precision.
Which is more discreet, the Utillian 722 or the The Coma?
Utillian 722 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the The Coma is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.