Price (USD)
Close callLinx Eden
$100
XMAX V3 Pro
$110
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Eden
Linx Vapor $100
XMAX V3 Pro
XMAX $110
Linx Eden and XMAX V3 Pro are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($100 vs $110). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
24
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
8%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Linx Eden
$100
XMAX V3 Pro
$110
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Linx Eden
116 grams
XMAX V3 Pro
105 grams
XMAX V3 Pro is the lighter listed unit.
Linx Eden
Convection
XMAX V3 Pro
Hybrid (primarily convection)
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Eden
$100
XMAX V3 Pro
$110
Heating Type
Linx Eden
Convection
XMAX V3 Pro
Hybrid (primarily convection)
Temperature Range
Linx Eden
360°F - 430°F (182°C - 221°C)
XMAX V3 Pro
100 - 220C (212 - 428F)
Chamber Capacity
Linx Eden
0.15g - 0.25g
XMAX V3 Pro
0.1g - 0.15g
Battery Type
Linx Eden
Internal
XMAX V3 Pro
18650 (user replaceable)
Charging
Linx Eden
Micro USB
XMAX V3 Pro
USB-C
Weight
Linx Eden
116 grams
XMAX V3 Pro
105 grams
Power Adjustment
Linx Eden
4 Preset Modes
XMAX V3 Pro
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
Linx Eden
Ceramic & Quartz
XMAX V3 Pro
Stainless steel
Brand
Linx Eden
Linx Vapor
XMAX V3 Pro
XMAX
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Linx Eden | XMAX V3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $100 | $110 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
| Heat Up Time | — | 15-30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 360°F - 430°F (182°C - 221°C) | 100 - 220C (212 - 428F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.15g - 0.25g | 0.1g - 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Internal | 18650 (user replaceable) |
| Battery Capacity | 2500mAh | — |
| Battery Life | — | 30-45 minutes or 5-6 sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 3 - 4 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 24 x 130mm | — |
| Width | — | 2.5cm |
| Height | — | 15cm |
| Weight | 116 grams | 105 grams |
| Power Adjustment | 4 Preset Modes | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic & Quartz | Stainless steel |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | No |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Heating Element | — | Ceramic |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2021 |
| Session Style | — | Both |
| Thickness | — | 2.3cm |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Linx Eden runs convection while XMAX V3 Pro runs hybrid (primarily convection). That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Linx Eden uses convection heating, while the XMAX V3 Pro uses hybrid (primarily convection). Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Linx Eden has the larger chamber at 0.15g - 0.25g, versus 0.1g - 0.15g on the XMAX V3 Pro. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $100 for the Linx Eden versus $110 for the XMAX V3 Pro. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
XMAX V3 Pro uses 18650 (user replaceable), so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The Linx Eden has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Linx Eden controls heat with 4 preset modes, while the XMAX V3 Pro uses digital (precise). XMAX V3 Pro gives you finer per-degree control.
Linx Eden is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX V3 Pro is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.