Price (USD)
XMAX Riggo edgeLinx Apollo
$260
XMAX Riggo
$59
XMAX Riggo is typically around $201 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Linx Apollo vs XMAX Riggo
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
VS
XMAX Riggo
XMAX $59
Editorial Summary
Linx Apollo and XMAX Riggo are both portable / concentrates vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Riggo is usually the lower-cost pick at $59, around $201 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
18
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
18%
Shared Traits
Portable Concentrates Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$260
XMAX Riggo
$59
Temperature Range
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
XMAX Riggo
260°C - 380°C (500°F - 716°F)
Battery Capacity
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
XMAX Riggo
1000mAh
Charging
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
XMAX Riggo
USB-C
Power Adjustment
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
XMAX Riggo
Modular - 5 Stages
Chamber Material
Linx Apollo
Quartz
XMAX Riggo
Ceramic
Brand
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor
XMAX Riggo
XMAX
Warranty
Linx Apollo
1 year
XMAX Riggo
6 months
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- You prefer Linx Apollo's overall feature mix and form factor.
- You value how the Linx Apollo balances size, controls, and everyday practicality.
Choose XMAX Riggo if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($59 vs $260).
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward budget and conduction sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
18 differ 4 shared
| Specification | Linx Apollo | XMAX Riggo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $260 | $59 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | — | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~15 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 220°F - 428°F | 260°C - 380°C (500°F - 716°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | N/A | N/A |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | 1000mAh |
| Battery Life | ~10 sessions | — |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 3-4 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 60 x 40 x 40mm | — |
| Weight | 150 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | Modular - 5 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Yes |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Session Style | — | Both |
| Warranty | 1 year | 6 months |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the Linx Apollo and the XMAX Riggo?
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX Riggo sits at $59 while the Linx Apollo is $260, a gap of about $201 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Which is cheaper, the Linx Apollo or the XMAX Riggo?
XMAX Riggo is the cheaper option at $59 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $201 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Can I use concentrates with the Linx Apollo or the XMAX Riggo?
Both devices support concentrate use, typically via an included or aftermarket pad or insert. Check the manual for the recommended approach for each.
Which uses USB-C, the Linx Apollo or the XMAX Riggo?
XMAX Riggo charges over USB-C; the Linx Apollo uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
How similar are the Linx Apollo and the XMAX Riggo?
Across the 22 specs we line up, they share 4 and differ on 18, an overlap of about 18%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.