Price (USD)
Linx Apollo edgeLinx Apollo
$190
The Coma
$588
Linx Apollo is typically around $398 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $190
The Coma
Vices $588
Linx Apollo and The Coma are both electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Linx Apollo is usually the lower-cost pick at $190, around $398 below The Coma. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
26
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Linx Apollo
$190
The Coma
$588
Linx Apollo is typically around $398 lower.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$190
The Coma
$588
Device Type
Linx Apollo
Portable
The Coma
Desktop
Temperature Range
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
The Coma
200-300°C (392-572°F) recommended by Vices
Chamber Capacity
Linx Apollo
N/A
The Coma
0.2g to 1.6g
Battery Type
Linx Apollo
Internal
The Coma
None
Battery Capacity
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
The Coma
N/A
Charging
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
The Coma
N/A
Power Adjustment
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
The Coma
PID controller, switchable between °C and °F
Chamber Material
Linx Apollo
Quartz
The Coma
Titanium Macro Bowl with an Everlasting titanium screen
Brand
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor
The Coma
Vices
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Linx Apollo | The Coma |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $190 | $588 |
| Device Type | Portable | Desktop |
| Heating Type | — | Convection (wired ball vaporizer) |
| Temperature Range | 220°F - 428°F | 200-300°C (392-572°F) recommended by Vices |
| Chamber Capacity | N/A | 0.2g to 1.6g |
| Battery Type | Internal | None |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | N/A |
| Battery Life | ~10 sessions | — |
| Charging | Micro USB | N/A |
| Charge Time | 3-4 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 60 x 40 x 40mm | — |
| Weight | 150 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | PID controller, switchable between °C and °F |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | Titanium Macro Bowl with an Everlasting titanium screen |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | Vices |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Coil Size | — | 35mm enclosed coil, wired directly to the PID |
| Heater Material | — | Titanium with an aluminium handle and heat sync hardware |
| Manufacturer | — | Vices, Brisbane Australia |
| Power Options | — | 110V (US and Canada) or 220V (AU, UK and EU) |
| Release Date | — | 2026 |
| Session Style | — | On-Demand |
| Thermal Matrix | — | ~3500 mixed cut ruby corundum gems, 2 to 2.5mm |
| Warranty | 1 year | Australian Consumer Law cover, no fixed term published. Consumables excluded |
| Water Pipe Adapter | — | 14mm glass joint fitted, 18mm spare included |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the Linx Apollo sits at $190 while the The Coma is $588, a gap of about $398 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Linx Apollo is the cheaper option at $190 compared with $588 for the The Coma, about $398 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Linx Apollo is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the The Coma is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
Linx Apollo controls heat with modular - 4 stages, while the The Coma uses pid controller, switchable between °c and °f. Both let you change temperature, just with different levels of precision.
Linx Apollo lists a chamber capacity of N/A; the The Coma lists 0.2g to 1.6g.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.