Price (USD)
Linx Apollo edgeLinx Apollo
$260
Sublimator
$550
Linx Apollo is typically around $290 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Linx Apollo vs Sublimator
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
VS
Sublimator
Sublimator $550
Editorial Summary
Linx Apollo and Sublimator are both electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Linx Apollo is usually the lower-cost pick at $260, around $290 below Sublimator. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
21
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$260
Sublimator
$550
Device Type
Linx Apollo
Portable
Sublimator
Desktop
Chamber Capacity
Linx Apollo
N/A
Sublimator
0.05g - 0.25g
Battery Type
Linx Apollo
Internal
Sublimator
N/A
Charging
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Sublimator
N/A
Power Adjustment
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
Sublimator
Single Dial
Chamber Material
Linx Apollo
Quartz
Sublimator
Stainless Steel & Titanium
Brand
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor
Sublimator
Sublimator
Warranty
Linx Apollo
1 year
Sublimator
10 years (1 year electronics)
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($260 vs $550).
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward portable and concentrates sessions.
Choose Sublimator if...
- You prefer a convection heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward desktop and convection sessions.
- You prefer Sublimator's overall feature mix and form factor.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
21 differ 0 shared
| Specification | Linx Apollo | Sublimator |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $260 | $550 |
| Device Type | Portable | Desktop |
| Heating Type | — | Convection |
| Temperature Range | 220°F - 428°F | — |
| Chamber Capacity | N/A | 0.05g - 0.25g |
| Battery Type | Internal | N/A |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | — |
| Battery Life | ~10 sessions | — |
| Charging | Micro USB | N/A |
| Charge Time | 3-4 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 60 x 40 x 40mm | — |
| Weight | 150 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | Single Dial |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | Stainless Steel & Titanium |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | Sublimator |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | Canada |
| Release Date | — | 2012 |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 10 years (1 year electronics) |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the Linx Apollo and the Sublimator?
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the Linx Apollo sits at $260 while the Sublimator is $550, a gap of about $290 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Which is cheaper, the Linx Apollo or the Sublimator?
Linx Apollo is the cheaper option at $260 compared with $550 for the Sublimator, about $290 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Is the Linx Apollo or the Sublimator better for home versus on-the-go use?
Linx Apollo is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the Sublimator is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
How much flower do the Linx Apollo and Sublimator hold?
Linx Apollo lists a chamber capacity of N/A; the Sublimator lists 0.05g - 0.25g.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.