Price (USD)
POTV Lobo edgeLinx Apollo
$260
POTV Lobo
$160
POTV Lobo is typically around $100 lower.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
Linx Apollo and POTV Lobo are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. POTV Lobo is usually the lower-cost pick at $160, around $100 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
15
Different Specs
15
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Linx Apollo
$260
POTV Lobo
$160
POTV Lobo is typically around $100 lower.
Linx Apollo
—
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Linx Apollo
150 grams
POTV Lobo
150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
Linx Apollo
—
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$260
POTV Lobo
$160
Device Type
Linx Apollo
—
POTV Lobo
Portable
Heating Type
Linx Apollo
—
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
Heat Up Time
Linx Apollo
—
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
Temperature Range
Linx Apollo
—
POTV Lobo
160-221°C (320-430°F)
Battery Type
Linx Apollo
—
POTV Lobo
Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650)
Battery Capacity
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
POTV Lobo
—
Charging
Linx Apollo
—
POTV Lobo
USB-C
Dimensions
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
POTV Lobo
8.89cm H without stem, 10.16cm H with dimpled stem, 5.4cm W, 2.85cm D
Weight
Linx Apollo
150 grams
POTV Lobo
150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (15 differences, 0 overlaps)
| Specification | Linx Apollo | POTV Lobo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $260 | $160 |
| Device Type diff | — | Portable |
| Heating Type diff | — | Dynamic Hybrid |
| Heat Up Time diff | — | ~40 seconds |
| Temperature Range diff | — | 160-221°C (320-430°F) |
| Battery Type diff | — | Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650) |
| Battery Capacity diff | 2600mAh | — |
| Charging diff | — | USB-C |
| Dimensions diff | 60 x 40 x 40mm | 8.89cm H without stem, 10.16cm H with dimpled stem, 5.4cm W, 2.85cm D |
| Weight diff | 150 grams | 150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem |
| Power Adjustment diff | Modular - 4 Stages | Digital (LCD) |
| Brand diff | Linx Vapor | Planet of the Vapes |
| Battery Runtime diff | — | Up to ~10 sessions per charge |
| Concentrates diff | — | Supported with included concentrate pad in the dosing capsule (use very small amounts) |
| Warranty diff | — | 2 years through POTV |
Neither is universally better. Linx Apollo fits some priorities, while POTV Lobo fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
POTV Lobo is listed lower ($160) compared with Linx Apollo ($260), but live retailer pricing can change.
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.