Price (USD)
IOLITE 2.0 edgeIOLITE 2.0
$90
Zeus Arc GT
$180
IOLITE 2.0 is typically around $90 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
IOLITE 2.0 vs Zeus Arc GT
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
IOLITE 2.0
IOLITE $90
VS
Zeus Arc GT
Zeus Arsenal $180
Editorial Summary
IOLITE 2.0 and Zeus Arc GT are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. IOLITE 2.0 is usually the lower-cost pick at $90, around $90 below Zeus Arc GT. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
19
Different Specs
16
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
16%
Shared Traits
Portable Conduction
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Weight
IOLITE 2.0 edgeIOLITE 2.0
81g
Zeus Arc GT
~125g
IOLITE 2.0 is the lighter listed unit.
Heating Style
Close callIOLITE 2.0
Conduction
Zeus Arc GT
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
IOLITE 2.0
$90
Zeus Arc GT
$180
Temperature Range
IOLITE 2.0
Fixed at 190°C (374°F)
Zeus Arc GT
365°F - 437°F
Chamber Capacity
IOLITE 2.0
~0.5g
Zeus Arc GT
~0.3 grams
Battery Type
IOLITE 2.0
None
Zeus Arc GT
Internal
Battery Capacity
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
Zeus Arc GT
3500mAh
Battery Life
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
Zeus Arc GT
~90 minutes
Charging
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
Zeus Arc GT
Micro USB
Dimensions
IOLITE 2.0
102x25x64mm
Zeus Arc GT
86x42x22mm
Weight
IOLITE 2.0
81g
Zeus Arc GT
~125g
Power Adjustment
IOLITE 2.0
Fixed
Zeus Arc GT
Modular - 3 Stages
Choose IOLITE 2.0 if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($90 vs $180).
- You want the lighter unit for carrying and travel.
- Your usage leans toward analog sessions.
Choose Zeus Arc GT if...
- Your usage leans toward electronic sessions.
- You prefer Zeus Arc GT's overall feature mix and form factor.
- You value how the Zeus Arc GT balances size, controls, and everyday practicality.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
16 differ 3 shared
| Specification | IOLITE 2.0 | Zeus Arc GT |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $90 | $180 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Temperature Range | Fixed at 190°C (374°F) | 365°F - 437°F |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.5g | ~0.3 grams |
| Battery Type | None | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | N/A | 3500mAh |
| Battery Life | N/A | ~90 minutes |
| Charging | N/A | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | N/A | — |
| Dimensions | 102x25x64mm | 86x42x22mm |
| Weight | 81g | ~125g |
| Power Adjustment | Fixed | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Gold-Plated |
| Brand | IOLITE | Zeus Arsenal |
| Country of Manufacture | Ireland | — |
| Release Date | — | 2018 |
| Session Style | Session | Session |
| Warranty | 2 years | 3 years |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the IOLITE 2.0 and the Zeus Arc GT?
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 16 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
Which is cheaper, the IOLITE 2.0 or the Zeus Arc GT?
IOLITE 2.0 is the cheaper option at $90 compared with $180 for the Zeus Arc GT, about $90 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Does the IOLITE 2.0 or the Zeus Arc GT hold more flower?
IOLITE 2.0 has the larger chamber at ~0.5g, versus ~0.3 grams on the Zeus Arc GT. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Which is lighter, the IOLITE 2.0 or the Zeus Arc GT?
IOLITE 2.0 is the lighter unit at 81g, around 44g less than the Zeus Arc GT at ~125g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
What battery life can I expect from the IOLITE 2.0 and the Zeus Arc GT?
IOLITE 2.0's spec sheet lists N/A; the Zeus Arc GT lists ~90 minutes. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
How similar are the IOLITE 2.0 and the Zeus Arc GT?
Across the 19 specs we line up, they share 3 and differ on 16, an overlap of about 16%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.