Price (USD)
IOLITE 2.0 edgeIOLITE 2.0
$90
Tempest 2
$179
IOLITE 2.0 is typically around $89 lower.
VS
IOLITE 2.0 vs Tempest 2
Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
Editorial Summary
IOLITE 2.0 and Tempest 2 are both portable / analog vaporizers, but they target different priorities. IOLITE 2.0 is usually the lower-cost pick at $90, around $89 below Tempest 2. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
12
Different Specs
12
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
PortableAnalog
Head-to-Head Highlights
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Weight
Close / ContextualIOLITE 2.0
—
Tempest 2
46g
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
Heating Style
Close / ContextualIOLITE 2.0
—
Tempest 2
Convection-heavy with thermal ball matrix
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
IOLITE 2.0
$90
Tempest 2
$179
Device Type
IOLITE 2.0
—
Tempest 2
Portable
Heating Type
IOLITE 2.0
—
Tempest 2
Convection-heavy with thermal ball matrix
Chamber Capacity
IOLITE 2.0
—
Tempest 2
0.1g - 0.2g (adjustable)
Dimensions
IOLITE 2.0
—
Tempest 2
122mm x 18.5mm
Weight
IOLITE 2.0
—
Tempest 2
46g
Brand
IOLITE 2.0
—
Tempest 2
Mad Heaters
Batteries
IOLITE 2.0
—
Tempest 2
None
Country Of Manufacture
IOLITE 2.0
—
Tempest 2
United Kingdom
Heating Time
IOLITE 2.0
—
Tempest 2
~30-45 seconds with torch
Choose IOLITE 2.0 if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($90 vs $179).
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward conduction sessions.
Choose Tempest 2 if...
- You prefer a convection-heavy with thermal ball matrix heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward premium and hybrid sessions.
- You prefer Tempest 2's overall feature mix and form factor.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (12 differences, 0 overlaps)
| Specification | IOLITE 2.0 | Tempest 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $90 | $179 |
| Device Type diff | — | Portable |
| Heating Type diff | — | Convection-heavy with thermal ball matrix |
| Chamber Capacity diff | — | 0.1g - 0.2g (adjustable) |
| Dimensions diff | — | 122mm x 18.5mm |
| Weight diff | — | 46g |
| Brand diff | — | Mad Heaters |
| Batteries diff | — | None |
| Country Of Manufacture diff | — | United Kingdom |
| Heating Time diff | — | ~30-45 seconds with torch |
| Materials diff | — | Grade 5 titanium, aluminum heat shield, stainless steel |
| Temperature Control diff | — | Visual gauge with click indicators |
Comparison FAQs
Is IOLITE 2.0 better than Tempest 2?
Neither is universally better. IOLITE 2.0 fits some priorities, while Tempest 2 fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
Which is cheaper: IOLITE 2.0 or Tempest 2?
IOLITE 2.0 is listed lower ($90) compared with Tempest 2 ($179), but live retailer pricing can change.
Which heats up faster between IOLITE 2.0 and Tempest 2?
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Need a Different Matchup?
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.