Price (USD)
IOLITE 2.0 edgeIOLITE 2.0
$90
Linx Apollo
$260
IOLITE 2.0 is typically around $170 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
IOLITE 2.0 vs Linx Apollo
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
IOLITE 2.0
IOLITE $90
VS
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
Editorial Summary
IOLITE 2.0 and Linx Apollo are both portable vaporizers, but they target different priorities. IOLITE 2.0 is usually the lower-cost pick at $90, around $170 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
20
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
5%
Shared Traits
Portable
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Weight
IOLITE 2.0 edgeIOLITE 2.0
81g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
IOLITE 2.0 is the lighter listed unit.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
IOLITE 2.0
$90
Linx Apollo
$260
Temperature Range
IOLITE 2.0
Fixed at 190°C (374°F)
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Chamber Capacity
IOLITE 2.0
~0.5g
Linx Apollo
N/A
Battery Type
IOLITE 2.0
None
Linx Apollo
Internal
Battery Capacity
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
Battery Life
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
Linx Apollo
~10 sessions
Charging
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Charge Time
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
Linx Apollo
3-4 hours
Dimensions
IOLITE 2.0
102x25x64mm
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Weight
IOLITE 2.0
81g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Choose IOLITE 2.0 if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($90 vs $260).
- You want the lighter unit for carrying and travel.
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward conduction and analog sessions.
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward concentrates and electronic sessions.
- You prefer Linx Apollo's overall feature mix and form factor.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
19 differ 1 shared
| Specification | IOLITE 2.0 | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $90 | $260 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | — |
| Temperature Range | Fixed at 190°C (374°F) | 220°F - 428°F |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.5g | N/A |
| Battery Type | None | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | N/A | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | N/A | ~10 sessions |
| Charging | N/A | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | N/A | 3-4 hours |
| Dimensions | 102x25x64mm | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | 81g | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Fixed | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | IOLITE | Linx Vapor |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | Yes |
| Country of Manufacture | Ireland | — |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the IOLITE 2.0 and the Linx Apollo?
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the IOLITE 2.0 sits at $90 while the Linx Apollo is $260, a gap of about $170 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Which is cheaper, the IOLITE 2.0 or the Linx Apollo?
IOLITE 2.0 is the cheaper option at $90 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $170 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Which is lighter, the IOLITE 2.0 or the Linx Apollo?
IOLITE 2.0 is the lighter unit at 81g, around 69g less than the Linx Apollo at 150 grams. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
How much flower do the IOLITE 2.0 and Linx Apollo hold?
IOLITE 2.0 lists a chamber capacity of ~0.5g; the Linx Apollo lists N/A.
What battery life can I expect from the IOLITE 2.0 and the Linx Apollo?
IOLITE 2.0's spec sheet lists N/A; the Linx Apollo lists ~10 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.