Price (USD)
Linx Apollo edgeIO Hornet
$260
Linx Apollo
$190
Linx Apollo is typically around $70 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
IO Hornet vs Linx Apollo
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
IO Hornet
IO MFG $260
VS
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $190
Editorial Summary
IO Hornet and Linx Apollo are both electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Linx Apollo is usually the lower-cost pick at $190, around $70 below IO Hornet. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
26
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
IO Hornet
$260
Linx Apollo
$190
Device Type
IO Hornet
Desktop
Linx Apollo
Portable
Temperature Range
IO Hornet
271-338°C (520-640°F) recommended by IO MFG
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Chamber Capacity
IO Hornet
0.08g to about 0.2g, around 0.15g for a full draw
Linx Apollo
N/A
Battery Type
IO Hornet
None
Linx Apollo
Internal
Charging
IO Hornet
None
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Power Adjustment
IO Hornet
Set on a separate PID controller, included only in the Complete Kit
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
Chamber Material
IO Hornet
316L stainless steel with a Bocote wood handle
Linx Apollo
Quartz
Concentrate Support
IO Hornet
Suited to traditional hash, not built for wax or oil
Linx Apollo
Yes
Brand
IO Hornet
IO MFG
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor
Choose IO Hornet if...
- You prefer a convection as an injector, hybrid with conduction as a diffuser heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward desktop and ball vape sessions.
- You prefer IO Hornet's overall feature mix and form factor.
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($190 vs $260).
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward portable and concentrates sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
26 differ 0 shared
| Specification | IO Hornet | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $260 | $190 |
| Device Type | Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection as an injector, hybrid with conduction as a diffuser | — |
| Heat Up Time | 3-5 minutes on a 16mm coil, longer on 20mm and 25mm adapters | — |
| Temperature Range | 271-338°C (520-640°F) recommended by IO MFG | 220°F - 428°F |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.08g to about 0.2g, around 0.15g for a full draw | N/A |
| Battery Type | None | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | — | ~10 sessions |
| Charging | None | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | — | 3-4 hours |
| Dimensions | — | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | — | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Set on a separate PID controller, included only in the Complete Kit | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Chamber Material | 316L stainless steel with a Bocote wood handle | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | Suited to traditional hash, not built for wax or oil | Yes |
| Brand | IO MFG | Linx Vapor |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | Yes |
| Ball Type | 100 x 2.5mm lab grown ruby balls | — |
| Bowl Compatibility | Classic DynaVap tips, IO conduction and glass bowls, many third party 14mm bowls | — |
| Coil Size | 16mm, with adapters for 20mm and 25mm coils | — |
| Joint Size | 14mm bowls included, 10mm and 14mm diffusers, 14mm and 22mm injectors | — |
| Manufacturer | IO MFG LLC | — |
| Release Date | 2024 | — |
| Session Style | On-Demand | — |
| Warranty | None, IO MFG sells the Hornet as is with no express or implied warranty | 1 year |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the IO Hornet and the Linx Apollo?
The biggest practical difference is form factor: these aren't the same kind of device. IO Hornet is a desktop, Linx Apollo is a portable. Pick based on whether you want something portable or something stationary.
Which is cheaper, the IO Hornet or the Linx Apollo?
Linx Apollo is the cheaper option at $190 compared with $260 for the IO Hornet, about $70 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Is the IO Hornet or the Linx Apollo better for home versus on-the-go use?
Linx Apollo is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the IO Hornet is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
Can I set custom temperatures on the IO Hornet or the Linx Apollo?
IO Hornet controls heat with set on a separate pid controller, included only in the complete kit, while the Linx Apollo uses modular - 4 stages. Both let you change temperature, just with different levels of precision.
How much flower do the IO Hornet and Linx Apollo hold?
IO Hornet lists a chamber capacity of 0.08g to about 0.2g, around 0.15g for a full draw; the Linx Apollo lists N/A.
Is the IO Hornet or the Linx Apollo better for microdosing?
IO Hornet is the better fit for microdosing in our database, typically thanks to a smaller chamber, finer temperature control, or both.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.