Price (USD)
Flowermate CAP edgeFlowermate CAP
$75
POTV Lobo
$160
Flowermate CAP is typically around $85 lower.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
Flowermate CAP and POTV Lobo are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Flowermate CAP is usually the lower-cost pick at $75, around $85 below POTV Lobo. Flowermate CAP has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
17
Different Specs
17
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Flowermate CAP
$75
POTV Lobo
$160
Flowermate CAP is typically around $85 lower.
Flowermate CAP
~20 seconds
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
Flowermate CAP has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Flowermate CAP
90 grams
POTV Lobo
150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem
Flowermate CAP is the lighter listed unit.
Flowermate CAP
Conduction
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Flowermate CAP
$75
POTV Lobo
$160
Device Type
Flowermate CAP
—
POTV Lobo
Portable
Heating Type
Flowermate CAP
Conduction
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
Heat Up Time
Flowermate CAP
~20 seconds
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
Temperature Range
Flowermate CAP
196℃ to 215℃
POTV Lobo
160-221°C (320-430°F)
Chamber Capacity
Flowermate CAP
0.3 grams
POTV Lobo
—
Battery Type
Flowermate CAP
—
POTV Lobo
Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650)
Battery Capacity
Flowermate CAP
900mAh
POTV Lobo
—
Charging
Flowermate CAP
—
POTV Lobo
USB-C
Charge Time
Flowermate CAP
1 hour
POTV Lobo
—
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (17 differences, 0 overlaps)
| Specification | Flowermate CAP | POTV Lobo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $75 | $160 |
| Device Type diff | — | Portable |
| Heating Type diff | Conduction | Dynamic Hybrid |
| Heat Up Time diff | ~20 seconds | ~40 seconds |
| Temperature Range diff | 196℃ to 215℃ | 160-221°C (320-430°F) |
| Chamber Capacity diff | 0.3 grams | — |
| Battery Type diff | — | Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650) |
| Battery Capacity diff | 900mAh | — |
| Charging diff | — | USB-C |
| Charge Time diff | 1 hour | — |
| Dimensions diff | 30 x 93 x 20mm | 8.89cm H without stem, 10.16cm H with dimpled stem, 5.4cm W, 2.85cm D |
| Weight diff | 90 grams | 150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem |
| Power Adjustment diff | Modular - 3 stages | Digital (LCD) |
| Brand diff | Flowermate | Planet of the Vapes |
| Battery Runtime diff | — | Up to ~10 sessions per charge |
| Concentrates diff | — | Supported with included concentrate pad in the dosing capsule (use very small amounts) |
| Warranty diff | — | 2 years through POTV |
Neither is universally better. Flowermate CAP fits some priorities, while POTV Lobo fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
Flowermate CAP is listed lower ($75) compared with POTV Lobo ($160), but live retailer pricing can change.
Flowermate CAP has the faster listed heat-up time (~20 seconds) versus POTV Lobo (~40 seconds).
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.