Price (USD)
Flowermate CAP edgeFlowermate CAP
$75
POTV Lobo
$160
Flowermate CAP is typically around $85 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Flowermate CAP
POTV Lobo
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Flowermate CAP and POTV Lobo are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Flowermate CAP is usually the lower-cost pick at $75, around $85 below POTV Lobo. Flowermate CAP has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
17
Different Specs
17
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Flowermate CAP
$75
POTV Lobo
$160
Flowermate CAP is typically around $85 lower.
Flowermate CAP
~20 seconds
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
Flowermate CAP has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Flowermate CAP
90 grams
POTV Lobo
150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem
Flowermate CAP is the lighter listed unit.
Flowermate CAP
Conduction
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Flowermate CAP
$75
POTV Lobo
$160
Device Type
Flowermate CAP
—
POTV Lobo
Portable
Heating Type
Flowermate CAP
Conduction
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
Heat Up Time
Flowermate CAP
~20 seconds
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
Temperature Range
Flowermate CAP
196℃ to 215℃
POTV Lobo
160-221°C (320-430°F)
Chamber Capacity
Flowermate CAP
0.3 grams
POTV Lobo
—
Battery Type
Flowermate CAP
—
POTV Lobo
Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650)
Battery Capacity
Flowermate CAP
900mAh
POTV Lobo
—
Charging
Flowermate CAP
—
POTV Lobo
USB-C
Charge Time
Flowermate CAP
1 hour
POTV Lobo
—
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Flowermate CAP | POTV Lobo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $75 | $160 |
| Device Type | — | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Dynamic Hybrid |
| Heat Up Time | ~20 seconds | ~40 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 196℃ to 215℃ | 160-221°C (320-430°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.3 grams | — |
| Battery Type | — | Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650) |
| Battery Capacity | 900mAh | — |
| Charging | — | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 1 hour | — |
| Dimensions | 30 x 93 x 20mm | 8.89cm H without stem, 10.16cm H with dimpled stem, 5.4cm W, 2.85cm D |
| Weight | 90 grams | 150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 3 stages | Digital (LCD) |
| Brand | Flowermate | Planet of the Vapes |
| Battery Runtime | — | Up to ~10 sessions per charge |
| Concentrates | — | Supported with included concentrate pad in the dosing capsule (use very small amounts) |
| Warranty | — | 2 years through POTV |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Flowermate CAP runs conduction while POTV Lobo runs dynamic hybrid. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Flowermate CAP is the cheaper option at $75 compared with $160 for the POTV Lobo, about $85 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Flowermate CAP reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the POTV Lobo takes ~40 seconds. That's roughly 20 seconds quicker on the Flowermate CAP, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Flowermate CAP uses conduction heating, while the POTV Lobo uses dynamic hybrid. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Flowermate CAP is the lighter unit at 90 grams, around 60g less than the POTV Lobo at 150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Flowermate CAP controls heat with modular - 3 stages, while the POTV Lobo uses digital (lcd). POTV Lobo gives you finer per-degree control.
Flowermate CAP is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the POTV Lobo is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.