Price (USD)
XMAX Riggo edgeFENiX Neo
$150
XMAX Riggo
$59
XMAX Riggo is typically around $91 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
FENiX Neo
FENiX $150
XMAX Riggo
XMAX from $58.95
FENiX Neo and XMAX Riggo are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Riggo is usually the lower-cost pick at $59, around $91 below FENiX Neo. XMAX Riggo has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
15%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
FENiX Neo
$150
XMAX Riggo
$59
XMAX Riggo is typically around $91 lower.
FENiX Neo
Under 30 seconds
XMAX Riggo
~15 seconds
XMAX Riggo has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
FENiX Neo
Convection
XMAX Riggo
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
FENiX Neo
$150
XMAX Riggo
$59
Heating Type
FENiX Neo
Convection
XMAX Riggo
Conduction
Heat Up Time
FENiX Neo
Under 30 seconds
XMAX Riggo
~15 seconds
Temperature Range
FENiX Neo
120°C - 221°C (248°F - 430°F)
XMAX Riggo
260°C - 380°C (500°F - 716°F)
Chamber Capacity
FENiX Neo
~0.25g
XMAX Riggo
N/A
Battery Capacity
FENiX Neo
3000mAh
XMAX Riggo
1000mAh
Power Adjustment
FENiX Neo
Digital (1 degree steps)
XMAX Riggo
Modular - 5 Stages
Chamber Material
FENiX Neo
Titanium
XMAX Riggo
Quartz
Brand
FENiX Neo
FENiX
XMAX Riggo
XMAX
Manufacturer
FENiX Neo
Weecke (Shenzhen Jianan)
XMAX Riggo
TopGreen Technology Co
Typical price
$150
Sold by The Green Box
Lowest price
$58.95
at VPM
Prices are read automatically from retailer pages and were last checked Aug 27, 2026; confirm the price at checkout. Some links are affiliate links, which support Thermal Extractions at no extra cost to you.
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | FENiX Neo | XMAX Riggo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $150 | $59 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | Under 30 seconds | ~15 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 120°C - 221°C (248°F - 430°F) | 260°C - 380°C (500°F - 716°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.25g | N/A |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 3000mAh | 1000mAh |
| Battery Life | ~8 to 12 sessions | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~2 hours at 5V/2A | — |
| Pass-Through Charging | No | — |
| Dimensions | 104 x 58 x 28mm | — |
| Weight | 216 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital (1 degree steps) | Modular - 5 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Titanium | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | FENiX | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Display Type | 0.78 inch dual OLED | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Manufacturer | Weecke (Shenzhen Jianan) | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2024 | — |
| Session Style | Session | Both |
| Session Timer | 3 to 7 minutes (adjustable) | — |
| Warranty | 2 years | 6 months |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: FENiX Neo runs convection while XMAX Riggo runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX Riggo is the cheaper option at $59 compared with $150 for the FENiX Neo, about $91 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX Riggo reaches session-ready temperature in ~15 seconds, while the FENiX Neo takes Under 30 seconds. That's roughly 15 seconds quicker on the XMAX Riggo, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
FENiX Neo uses convection heating, while the XMAX Riggo uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
FENiX Neo controls heat with digital (1 degree steps), while the XMAX Riggo uses modular - 5 stages. FENiX Neo gives you finer per-degree control.
FENiX Neo lists a chamber capacity of ~0.25g; the XMAX Riggo lists N/A.
Across the 26 specs we line up, they share 4 and differ on 22, an overlap of about 15%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.